Protective legislation: The "third pillar" of the welfare state

被引:3
作者
Olsen, Gregg M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Dept Sociol & Criminol, 318-183 Dafoe Rd,Isbister Bldg, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
关键词
legal welfare; protective measures; social policy; welfare regimes; welfare worlds; REGULATORY STATE; SOCIAL COHESION; HEALTH-CARE; REGIMES; ELECTRICITY; CITIZENSHIP; SERVICES; CANADA; POLICY; RISKS;
D O I
10.1111/spol.12471
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Welfare states are built upon three central social policy pillars: (1) income programs, including an assortment of income maintenance and security benefits; (2) social services, comprising a diverse constellation of provisions, which furnish care such as health care and education, and "in kind" benefits; and (3) protective legislation, encompassing a dense web of proactive and preventative laws, rights, and entitlements, such as health and safety legislation, minimum wage laws, child protection acts, rent controls, and laws governing evictions and foreclosures. Despite its centrality to the welfare state and to our well-being, this third pillar has received considerably less attention in comparative social policy research. The dominant welfare state typologies have focused almost exclusively upon income measures and, more recently, on social services, to construct their welfare state categories or "worlds" of welfare while largely neglecting this crucial third pillar. A greater focus on protective welfare legislation can help sharpen the distinctions among welfare states within and across the welfare worlds, which is particularly valuable in light of the ongoing erosion of the other two pillars over the past few decades.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 492
页数:15
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Welfare States and Social Cohesion in Europe: Does Social Service Quality Matter?
    Andrews, Rhys
    Jilke, Sebastian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 2016, 45 (01) : 119 - 140
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, BEST PRACT BREAKTHR
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1977, CAPITAL CRITIQUE POL
  • [4] Ara (Asumisen rahoitusja kehittamiskeskus/The Housing Finance and Development Centre of Finland), 2017, HOM 2016 REP 1 2017
  • [5] Cash versus services: 'Worlds of welfare' and the decommodification of cash benefits and health care services
    Bambra, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 2005, 34 : 195 - 213
  • [6] Burrows R., 1994, POSTFORDIST WELFARE, DOI [10.4324/9780203359846, DOI 10.4324/9780203359846]
  • [7] Desmond M., 2017, Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City
  • [8] desSchweinitz K., 1943, ENGLANDS ROAD SOCIAL
  • [9] Durrant J.E., 1997, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, V19, P443, DOI [10.1080/09649069708410210, DOI 10.1080/09649069708410210]
  • [10] Durrant JE, 2017, J KOR ACAD CHILD ADO, V28, P20, DOI 10.5765/jkacap.2017.28.1.20