What Is the Quality of Surgery-Related Information on the Internet? Lessons Learned from a Standardized Evaluation of 10 Common Operations

被引:13
作者
Yermilov, Irina [1 ,2 ]
Chow, Warren [1 ]
Devgan, Lara [3 ]
Makary, Martin A. [3 ]
Ko, Clifford Y. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Div Gen Surg, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Greater W Los Angeles VA Healthcare Syst, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.034
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Although there is high-quality information on the Internet, it is difficult for patients to identify high-quality Web sites from, chose with inaccurate or misleading information. Our goal was to determine specific characteristics of Web search results that yield high-quality information and can be discerned easily by patients. STUDY DESIGN: A validated rating system was used to evaluate surgical Web sites for appropriateness and adequacy. Web sites were identified using three search term types (technical, descriptive, and layperson) for 10 common surgical procedures. The top three sponsored (paid) and unsponsored (unpaid) Web site matches were identified. The search and analysis were repeated I month later. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five Web sites were retrieved: 90 unsponsored and 55 sponsored. Unsponsored sites had higher mean composite scores than sponsored Web sites (50.6% versus 25%, p < 0.0001). Searches using layperson terms had lower mean composite scores compared with those using technical terms (36.9% versus 47.5%, p < 0.02). Professional Web sites had the highest mean composite scores (66.3%); legal Web sites had the lowest (6.3%). On regression analysis, Unsponsored Web sites were associated with higher composite scores (p < 0.0001); number I match results (p < 0.02) and using layperson search terms (p < 0.052) were associated with lower mean composite scores. Repeat search results demonstrated no significant differences, except number 3 match results were no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: To optimize patients' Web searches, surgeons Should recommend Unsponsored sites; suggest professional society, sites, if available; and provide technical search terms. But Information Oil some topics, Such as risks Of not undergoing surgery, remains poor and requires discussion between the surgeon and patient. (J Am Coll Surg 2008;207:580-586. (C) 2008 by the American College of Surgeons)
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 586
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   The poor quality of information about laparoscopy on the World Wide Web as indexed by popular search engines [J].
Allen, JW ;
Finch, RJ ;
Coleman, MG ;
Nathanson, LK ;
O'Rourke, NA ;
Fielding, GA .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (01) :170-172
[2]  
[Anonymous], PAGERANK
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, PEW INTERNET AM LIFE
[4]   Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedic information on the Internet - The case of carpal tunnel syndrome [J].
Beredjiklian, PK ;
Bozentka, DJ ;
Steinberg, DR ;
Bernstein, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (11) :1540-1543
[5]   Melanoma information on the Internet: Often incomplete - A public health opportunity? [J].
Bichakjian, CK ;
Schwartz, JL ;
Wang, TS ;
Hall, JM ;
Johnson, TM ;
Biermann, JS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (01) :134-141
[6]  
*GOOGL, GOOGL ADV
[7]  
*GOOGL, 2008, GOOGL ADW ADS SEARCH
[8]   ... And a diagnostic test was performed [J].
Greenwald, R .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (19) :2089-2090
[9]   Evaluation of plastic surgery information on the Internet [J].
Jejurikar, SS ;
Rovak, JM ;
Kuzon, WM ;
Chung, KC ;
Kotsis, SV ;
Cederna, PS .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2002, 49 (05) :460-465
[10]  
KENTON K, 2007, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V197