Prevalence of Hazardous Occupational Noise Exposure, Hearing Loss, and Hearing Protection Usage Among a Representative Sample of Working Canadians

被引:77
作者
Feder, Katya [1 ]
Michaud, David [1 ]
McNamee, James [1 ]
Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth [2 ]
Davies, Hugh [3 ]
Leroux, Tony [4 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Canada, Hlth Effects & Assessment Div, 775 Brookfield Rd, Ottawa, ON K1A 1C1, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Fac Hlth Sci, Audiol & Speech Language Pathol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Occupat & Environm Hlth, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Ecole Orthophonie & Audiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
NUTRITION EXAMINATION SURVEY; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS; CONSTRUCTION-INDUSTRY; NATIONAL-HEALTH; OLDER WORKERS; US WORKERS; TINNITUS; RISK; IMPAIRMENT; WORKPLACE;
D O I
10.1097/JOM.0000000000000920
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of hearing loss (HL), self-reported occupational noise exposure, and hearing protection usage among Canadians. Methods: In-person household interviews were conducted with 3666 participants, aged 16 to 79 years (1811 males) with 94% completing audiometry and distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) evaluations. Occupational noise exposure was defined as hazardous when communicating with coworkers at an arm's length distance required speaking in a raised voice. Results: An estimated 42% of respondents reported hazardous occupational noise exposure; 10 years or more was associated with HL regardless of age, sex or education. Absent DPOAEs, tinnitus, and theWilson audiometric notch were significantly more prevalent in hazardous workplace noise-exposed workers than in nonexposed. When mandatory, 80% reported wearing hearing protection. Conclusions: These findings are consistent with other industrialized countries, underscoring the need for ongoing awareness of noise-induced occupational HL.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 113
页数:22
相关论文
共 117 条
  • [1] ACOEM Noise and Hearing Conservation Committee, 2003, J Occup Environ Med, V45, P579
  • [2] Adams P, 1995, VITAL HLTH STAT
  • [3] Socioeconomic disparities in health: Pathways and policies
    Adler, NE
    Newman, K
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2002, 21 (02) : 60 - 76
  • [4] American Academy of Audiology (AAA) Clinical Practice Guidelines, 2011, CHILDH HEAR SCREEEN
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2015, Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) Data User Guide: Cycle 3
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1997, Guidelines for audiologic screening
  • [7] Hearing protection use in industry: The role of risk perception
    Arezes, PM
    Miguel, AS
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2005, 43 (04) : 253 - 267
  • [8] Older workers in the construction industry: Results of a routine health examination and a five year follow up
    Arndt, V
    Rothenbacher, D
    Brenner, H
    Fraisse, E
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1996, 53 (10) : 686 - 691
  • [9] Atchariyasathian Viraporn, 2008, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, V91, P1066
  • [10] Noise-induced otoacoustic emission loss with or without hearing loss
    Attias, J
    Furst, M
    Furman, V
    Haran, IR
    Horowitz, G
    Bresloff, I
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 1995, 16 (06) : 612 - 618