Analysis and Comparison on Wind Load of Long Span Girder Bridges with High Pier

被引:2
|
作者
Ye Zheng-wei [1 ,2 ]
Xiang Yi-qiang [1 ]
Ye Zheng-wei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Shanxi Highway Transport Consulting CO Ltd, Xian, Peoples R China
关键词
Bridge engineering; long span bridge with high pier; wind load; code; analysis; comparison;
D O I
10.1016/j.proenv.2011.12.051
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
According to "General code for design of highway bridges and culverts" (JTG D60-2004), "Wind-resistent design specification for highway bridges" (JTG/T D60-01-2004) and "Load code for the design of building structures" (GB 50009-2001), the transverse direction wind load of long span girder bridge with high pier is calculated. Comparison of the wind load results obtained by different codes is completed under the situation of different terrain, pier height and girder length of bridge. The results show the difference of the wind load given by the three different codes exists. The wind load results predicated by "General code for design of highway bridges and culverts" is the largest compare with the results gained by other two methods. The results predicated by "Wind-resistent design specification for highway bridges" is less than results predicated by General code. While, the results predicated by "Load code for the design of building structures" is the smallest. The wind load calculated according to "Load code for the design of building structures" mainly depends on the experience parameters of architectural construction with larger dimensions, which has a poor applicability to the bridge structure. The effect of fluctuating wind's inertia force of long span girder bridges with high pier can't be neglected. The wind load results calculated by codes are generally smaller, it is better to determine the wind load internal force through a detailed buffeting analysis. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of the Intelligent Information Technology Application Research Association.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 327
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Wind-resistant analysis of long-span rigid frame bridge with high pier during construction
    State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    不详
    Tongji Daxue Xuebao, 2007, 2 (166-170): : 166 - 170
  • [23] Flutter performance of long-span twin-box girder bridges with different wind fairing forms
    Yang, Yong-Xin
    Zhou, Rui
    Li, Yuan
    Ge, Yao-Jun
    Zhendong Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2015, 28 (05): : 673 - 682
  • [24] Wind effects on long-span bridges: Probabilistic wind data format for buffeting and VIV load assessments
    Hoffmann, K.
    Srouji, R. G.
    Hansen, S. O.
    FIRST CONFERENCE OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY (COTECH2017), 2017, 276
  • [25] Numerical Simulation of Static Wind Coefficient and Flow Field of Box Girder of High Pier and Large Span Continuous Bridge
    Zhou, Zhipeng
    Jiang, Guangbiao
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 3RD INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE AND MATERIALS (IFEESM 2017), 2017, 120 : 299 - 305
  • [26] Seismic vulnerability analysis of small and medium span girder bridges
    Song S.
    Wang S.
    Wu G.
    Xu B.
    1600, Chinese Vibration Engineering Society (39): : 118 - 125
  • [27] Development of live load model for long span bridges
    Hwang, E. -S.
    Koh, H-M.
    Lee, S. W.
    APPLICATIONS OF STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2011, : 378 - 385
  • [28] Preliminary Evaluation of Wind Instability for Long Span Bridges
    Kimmle, Andrew R.
    Matos, Carlos G.
    STRUCTURES CONGRESS 2020, 2020, : 218 - 229
  • [29] Probabilistic methods in wind engineering for long span bridges
    Davenport, AG
    BRIDGE AERODYNAMICS, 1998, : 3 - 13
  • [30] Long span bridges buffeting response to wind turbulence
    Guzeev, R. N.
    Domaingo, A.
    MAGAZINE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 93 (01): : 35 - 49