Flow and pollutant dispersion in street canyons using FLUENT and ADMS-Urban

被引:91
作者
Di Sabatino, S. [1 ]
Buccolieri, R. [1 ]
Pulvirenti, B. [2 ]
Britter, R. E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lecce, Dipartimento Sci Mat, I-73100 Lecce, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, Dipartimento Ingn Energet Nucl & Controllo Ambient, Bologna, Italy
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
关键词
street canyons; dispersion; modelling; FLUENT; ADMS-Urban;
D O I
10.1007/s10666-007-9106-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper is devoted to the study of flow within a small building arrangement and pollutant dispersion in street canyons starting from the simplest case of dispersion from a simple traffic source. Flow results from the commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code FLUENT are validated against wind tunnel data (CEDVAL). Dispersion results from FLUENT are analysed using the well-validated atmospheric dispersion model ADMS-Urban. The k-epsilon turbulence model and the advection-diffusion (AD) method are used for the CFD simulations. Sensitivity of dispersion results to wind direction within street canyons of aspect ratio equal to 1 is investigated. The analysis shows that the CFD model well reproduces the wind tunnel flow measurements and compares adequately with ADMS-Urban dispersion predictions for a simple traffic source by using a slightly modified k-epsilon model. It is found that a Schmidt number of 0.4 is the most appropriate number for the simulation of a simple traffic source and in street canyons except for the case when the wind direction is perpendicular to the street canyon axis. For this last case a Schmidt number equal to 0.04 gives the best agreement with ADMS-Urban. Overall the modified k-epsilon turbulence model may be accurate for the simulation of pollutant dispersion in street canyons provided that an appropriate choice for coefficients in the turbulence model and the Schmidt number in the diffusion model are made.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 381
页数:13
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Barth T. J., 1989, 890366 AIAA, DOI DOI 10.2514/6.1989-366
[2]  
Berkowicz R, 2002, URBAN AIR QUALITY - RECENT ADVANCES, PROCEEDINGS, P311
[3]  
CARRUTHERS D, 2003, FM489R703 CERC CAMBR
[4]   UK-ADMS - A NEW APPROACH TO MODELING DISPERSION IN THE EARTHS ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY-LAYER [J].
CARRUTHERS, DJ ;
HOLROY, DRJ ;
HUNT, JCR ;
WENG, WS ;
ROBINS, AG ;
APSLEY, DD ;
THOMSON, DJ ;
SMITH, FB .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 1994, 52 (1-3) :139-153
[5]   Contrasting methods for validating ADMS using the Indianapolis dataset [J].
Carruthers, DJ ;
Dyster, S ;
McHugh, CA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2000, 14 (1-6) :115-121
[6]  
DECROIX D, 2002, 10 IOP LOS AL NAT LA
[7]  
DISABATINO S, 2005, P 5 INT C URB AIR QU
[8]  
Fluent, 2005, 6 2 US MAN
[9]   GROUND EFFECTS ON PRESSURE-FLUCTUATIONS IN ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY-LAYER [J].
GIBSON, MM ;
LAUNDER, BE .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1978, 86 (JUN) :491-511
[10]  
HANNA SR, 2001, INT J ENVIRON POLLUT, V16, P1