Working Memory Capacity in a Go/No-Go Task: Age Differences in Interference, Processing Speed, and Attentional Control

被引:10
作者
Rodriguez-Villagra, Odir Antonio [1 ]
Goethe, Katrin [1 ]
Oberauer, Klaus [2 ]
Kliegl, Reinhold [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Dept Psychol, D-14476 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Univ Zurich, Dept Psychol Cognit Psychol, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
working memory capacity; interference model; inhibition; children; old adults and young adults; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; INHIBITORY CONTROL; TIME-COURSE; MODEL; CONSTRAINTS; RESOURCES; CHILDREN; BINDING; STORAGE; ROLES;
D O I
10.1037/a0030883
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
We tested the limits of working-memory capacity (WMC) of young adults, old adults, and children with a memory-updating task. The task consisted of mentally shifting spatial positions within a grid according to arrows, their color signaling either only go (control) or go/no-go conditions. The interference model (IM) of Oberauer and Kliegl (2006) was simultaneously fitted to the data of all groups. In addition to the 3 main model parameters (feature overlap, noise, and processing rate), we estimated the time for switching between go and no-go steps as a new model parameter. In this study, we examined the IM parameters across the life span. The IM parameter estimates show that (a) conditions were not different in interference by feature overlap and interference by confusion; (b) switching costs time; (c) young adults and children were less susceptible than old adults to interference due to feature overlap; (d) noise was highest for children, followed by old and young adults; (e) old adults differed from children and young adults in lower processing rate; and (f) children and old adults had a larger switch cost between go steps and no-go steps. Thus, the results of this study indicated that across age, the IM parameters contribute distinctively for explaining the limits of WMC.
引用
收藏
页码:1683 / 1696
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Anderson D.R., 2008, Model based inference in the life sciences: a primer on evidence, P184, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-74075-1
[2]  
Anderson J.R., 1998, The Atomic Components of Thought
[3]  
[Anonymous], J STAT SOFTWARE
[4]   EFFECTS OF INCREASED PROCESSING DEMANDS ON AGE-DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY [J].
BABCOCK, RL ;
SALTHOUSE, TA .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1990, 5 (03) :421-428
[5]   Time constraints and resource sharing in adults' working memory spans [J].
Barrouillet, P ;
Bernardin, S ;
Camos, V .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2004, 133 (01) :83-100
[6]   Mapping the developmental constraints on working memory span performance [J].
Bayliss, DM ;
Jarrold, C ;
Baddeley, AD ;
Gunn, DM ;
Leigh, E .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 41 (04) :579-597
[7]   THE RESOURCES CONSTRUCT IN COGNITIVE-DEVELOPMENT - DIVERSE SOURCES OF EVIDENCE AND A THEORY OF INEFFICIENT INHIBITION [J].
BJORKLUND, DF ;
HARNISHFEGER, KK .
DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 1990, 10 (01) :48-71
[8]  
Burnham KP., 2002, MODEL SELECTION MULT, DOI DOI 10.1007/B97636
[9]   The roles of working memory updating and processing speed in mediating age-related differences in fluid intelligence [J].
Chen, Tianyong ;
Li, Deming .
AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION, 2007, 14 (06) :631-646
[10]   Working memory, inhibitory control, and reading disability [J].
Chiappe, P ;
Hasher, L ;
Siegel, LS .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2000, 28 (01) :8-17