Pediatric Organ Donation and Transplantation

被引:61
作者
Workman, Jennifer K. [1 ]
Myrick, Craig W. [3 ]
Meyers, Rebecka L. [2 ]
Bratton, Susan L. [1 ]
Nakagawa, Thomas A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Intermt Donor Serv, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Wake Forest Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
关键词
brain death; circulatory death; end of life; ethics; organ donation; pediatric; transplantation; BLOC KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; CARDIAC DEATH DONORS; LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION; SINGLE-CENTER; RECIPIENTS; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1542/peds.2012-3992
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is increasing unmet need for solid organ donation. Alternative donor sources, such as donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD), are needed. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of DCDD on trends in pediatric organ donation and transplantation. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network for US organ recipients and donors from 2001 to 2010 stratified according to age, organ, and deceased donor type (DCDD or donation after neurologic determination of death). Additional data included transplant wait-list removals due to death. RESULTS: From 2001 to 2010, pediatric organ transplant recipients increased from 1170 to 1475. Organs from DCDD donors were transplanted into children infrequently but increased from 1 to 31. Pediatric donation after neurologic determination of death decreased by 13% whereas DCDD increased by 174% (50 to 137). Recipients of pediatric grafts decreased from 3042 to 2751. Adults receiving grafts from pediatric donors decreased from 2243 to 1780; children receiving pediatric grafts increased from 799 to 971. Transplant recipients receiving pediatric DCDD grafts were few but increased annually from 50 to 128 adults and 0 to 9 children. Pediatric candidates dying waiting for an organ decreased from 262 to 110. CONCLUSIONS: From 2001 to 2010, children received more solid organ transplants and fewer children died waiting. Organ recovery from pediatric and adult DCDD donors increased. The number of pediatric recipients of DCDD grafts remains small. Adults primarily receive the direct benefit from pediatric DCDD but other changes in organ allocation have directly benefited children.
引用
收藏
页码:E1723 / E1730
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
[41]  
Organ Procurement & Transplantation Network, About data
[42]   Impact of a pediatric donation after cardiac death program [J].
Pleacher, Kristine M. ;
Roach, Elizabeth S. ;
Van der Werf, Willem ;
Antommaria, Armand H. M. ;
Bratton, Susan L. .
PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 10 (02) :166-170
[43]  
Potts JT., 1997, Non-Heart-Beating Organ Transplantation: Medical and Ethical Issues in Procurement
[44]   Changing Pattern of Organ Donation at a Single Center: Are Potential Brain Dead Donors Being Lost to Donation After Cardiac Death? [J].
Saidi, R. F. ;
Bradley, J. ;
Greer, D. ;
Luskin, R. ;
O'Connor, K. ;
Delmonico, F. ;
Kennealey, P. ;
Pathan, F. ;
Schuetz, C. ;
Elias, N. ;
Ko, D. S. C. ;
Kawai, T. ;
Hertl, M. ;
Cosimi, A. B. ;
Markmann, J. F. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 10 (11) :2536-2540
[45]  
Shafer TJ, 2006, CRIT CARE NURSE, V26, P33
[46]   En Bloc Kidney Transplantation From Pediatric Donors: Comparable Outcomes With Living Donor Kidney Transplantation [J].
Sharma, Amit ;
Fisher, Robert A. ;
Cotterell, Adrian H. ;
King, Anne L. ;
Maluf, Daniel G. ;
Posner, Marc P. .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 92 (05) :564-569
[47]  
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, DON GIFT LIF
[48]   Late Graft Loss among Pediatric Recipients of DCD Kidneys [J].
Van Arendonk, Kyle J. ;
James, Nathan T. ;
Locke, Jayme E. ;
Montgomery, Robert A. ;
Colombani, Paul M. ;
Segev, Dorry L. .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2011, 6 (11) :2705-2711
[49]   Donation after cardiac death in pediatric organ transplantation [J].
Yoo, Peter S. ;
Olthoff, Kim M. ;
Abt, Peter L. .
CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 16 (05) :483-488