Accuracy analysis of complete-arch digital scans in edentulous arches when using an auxiliary geometric device

被引:83
作者
Iturrate, Mikel [1 ]
Eguiraun, Harkaitz [1 ,2 ]
Etxaniz, Olatz [1 ]
Solaberrieta, Eneko [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, Engn Sch Bilbao, Dept Graph Design & Engn Projects, Bilbao, Spain
[2] Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, Plentzia Marine Stn, Res Ctr Expt Marine Biol & Biotechnol, Plentzia, Spain
[3] Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, Engn Sch Gipuzkoa, Dept Graph Design & Engn Projects, San Sebastian, Spain
关键词
CLINICAL-EVALUATION; MULTIPLE IMPLANTS; INTRAORAL SCANNER; IMPRESSIONS; PRECISION; FIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.09.017
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Obtaining reliable digital scans of edentulous patients is challenging because of the absence of anatomic landmarks/geometric variations along the dental arch. Whether adding an auxiliary geometric device (AGD) will improve scanning is unclear. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to analyze the accuracy of complete-arch digital scans of completely edentulous arches by placing a consumable AGD. Material and methods. stainless-steel model of the maxilla of a completely edentulous arch with 4 implants was built. The model was scanned using a reference industrial scanner as the control and using 3 intraoral scanners (True Definition [3M ESPE], TRIOS 3 [3Shape A/S], and iTero [Align Technology, Inc]). Each intraoral scanner was used 10 times without the AGD in place and 10 more times with the AGD fixed on the model. Accuracy in terms of trueness and precision was established by comparing 5 reference distances with or without the AGD in place. A software program for analyzing 3D data was used to measure these 5 distances, and a data analysis software program was used for statistical and measurements analysis (alpha=.05). Results. Significant differences (P<.05) were found in all reference distances for trueness and in 4 of the 5 reference distances for precision depending on whether the AGD had been used or not. Without the AGD in place, trueness ranged from 21 +/- 16 mu m in the shortest reference distance to 125 +/- 80 mu m in the largest reference distance. With the AGD in place, trueness ranged from 11 +/- 8 in the shortest reference distance to 64 +/- 51 mu m in the largest reference distance. Precision ranged from 18 +/- 14 mu m in the shortest reference distance to 84 +/- 74 mu m in the largest reference distance without the AGD and from 7 +/- 7 mu m in the shortest to 63 +/- 46 mu m in the largest with it. Conclusion. Complete-arch digital scans of edentulous jaws are more accurate when an AGD is used to resolve the lack of anatomic landmarks. An additional advantage is that the use of the AGD allows for a more fluent scanning process.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 454
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial
    Ahrberg, Danush
    Lauer, Hans Christoph
    Ahrberg, Martin
    Weigl, Paul
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 20 (02) : 291 - 300
  • [2] Ali AO, 2015, DENTISTRY, V5, P300
  • [3] Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: A pilot study
    Andriessen, Frank S.
    Riikens, David R.
    van der Meer, Wither J.
    Wismeijer, Daniell W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2014, 111 (03) : 186 - 194
  • [4] A comparison of the precision of three-dimensional images acquired by 2 digital intraoral scanners: effects of tooth irregularity and scanning direction
    Anh, Ji-won
    Park, Ji-Man
    Chun, Youn-Sic
    Kim, Miae
    Kim, Minji
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2016, 46 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [5] [Anonymous], PLOS ONE
  • [6] OSSEOINTEGRATION AND ITS EXPERIMENTAL BACKGROUND
    BRANEMARK, PI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1983, 50 (03) : 399 - 410
  • [7] Carr AB, 1995, J DENT RES, P74
  • [8] Ender A, 2011, Int J Comput Dent, V14, P11
  • [9] In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions
    Ender, Andreas
    Zimmermann, Moritz
    Attin, Thomas
    Mehl, Albert
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 20 (07) : 1495 - 1504
  • [10] In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions
    Ender, Andreas
    Mehl, Albert
    [J]. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 46 (01): : 9 - 17