How the environment is positioned in the Next Generation Science Standards: a critical discourse analysis

被引:18
作者
Hufnagel, Elizabeth [1 ]
Kelly, Gregory J. [2 ]
Henderson, Joseph A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maine, Sch Learning & Teaching, Orono, ME 04469 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Coll Educ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Univ Delaware, Sch Educ, Newark, DE USA
关键词
Standards; discourse; policy; environmental education; science; EDUCATION POLICY RESEARCH; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SUSTAINABILITY EDUCATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERACY; CHALLENGES; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1080/13504622.2017.1334876
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to describe how the environment and environmental issues are conceptualized and positioned in the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) to examine underlying assumptions about the environment. The NGSS are a recent set of science standards in the USA, organized and led by AchieveInc., that propose science education goals based on the National Research Council report, A Framework for K-12 Science Education. Drawing from critical discourse analysis, we present a detailed textual analysis of the NGSS to identify the positioning of the environment with respect to humans and human activity. This analysis shows patterns in the ways that the environment is conceptualized and inscribed in the standards as an entity separate from people through both exclusion and ambiguity. We also discuss findings about how agency is more often ascribed to actions or activities rather than people and when solutions to environmental issues are included, the focus is on technoscientific solutions. Finally, we provide implications for considering scientific and environmental literacy, education for action, and the role of standards documents in shaping educational practice.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 753
页数:23
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [41] Hufnagel E., 2017, Teaching and learning about climate change: A framework for educators, P59, DOI [10.4324/9781315629841-4, DOI 10.4324/9781315629841-4]
  • [42] Environmental education in a neoliberal climate
    Hursh, David
    Henderson, Joseph
    Greenwood, David
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2015, 21 (03) : 299 - 318
  • [43] IPCC, 2014, Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems, P571, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016, 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.024]
  • [44] Kelly GJ, 2011, TEACH LEARN SCI SER, P61
  • [45] Kelsey E., 2003, ENVIRON EDUC RES, V9, P403
  • [46] Sharp increase in central Oklahoma seismicity since 2008 induced by massive wastewater injection
    Keranen, K. M.
    Weingarten, M.
    Abers, G. A.
    Bekins, B. A.
    Ge, S.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2014, 345 (6195) : 448 - 451
  • [47] Environmental education policy research challenges and ways research might cope with them
    Laessoe, Jeppe
    Feinstein, Noah Weeth
    Blum, Nicole
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2013, 19 (02) : 231 - 242
  • [48] Latour Bruno., 1993, We have never been modern
  • [49] A porous silicon-based optical interferometric biosensor
    Lin, VSY
    Motesharei, K
    Dancil, KPS
    Sailor, MJ
    Ghadiri, MR
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1997, 278 (5339) : 840 - 843
  • [50] LINGARD B., 2007, The Routledge Falmer Reader in Education Policy and Politics /