How the environment is positioned in the Next Generation Science Standards: a critical discourse analysis

被引:18
作者
Hufnagel, Elizabeth [1 ]
Kelly, Gregory J. [2 ]
Henderson, Joseph A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maine, Sch Learning & Teaching, Orono, ME 04469 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Coll Educ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Univ Delaware, Sch Educ, Newark, DE USA
关键词
Standards; discourse; policy; environmental education; science; EDUCATION POLICY RESEARCH; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SUSTAINABILITY EDUCATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERACY; CHALLENGES; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1080/13504622.2017.1334876
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to describe how the environment and environmental issues are conceptualized and positioned in the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) to examine underlying assumptions about the environment. The NGSS are a recent set of science standards in the USA, organized and led by AchieveInc., that propose science education goals based on the National Research Council report, A Framework for K-12 Science Education. Drawing from critical discourse analysis, we present a detailed textual analysis of the NGSS to identify the positioning of the environment with respect to humans and human activity. This analysis shows patterns in the ways that the environment is conceptualized and inscribed in the standards as an entity separate from people through both exclusion and ambiguity. We also discuss findings about how agency is more often ascribed to actions or activities rather than people and when solutions to environmental issues are included, the focus is on technoscientific solutions. Finally, we provide implications for considering scientific and environmental literacy, education for action, and the role of standards documents in shaping educational practice.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 753
页数:23
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Forum: Toward a politics of place-based science education
    Aikenhead G.
    Calabrese A.B.
    Chinn P.W.U.
    [J]. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2006, 1 (2) : 403 - 416
  • [2] Environmental and sustainability education policy research: a systematic review of methodological and thematic trends
    Aikens, Kathleen
    McKenzie, Marcia
    Vaughter, Philip
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2016, 22 (03) : 333 - 359
  • [3] [Anonymous], J ENV ED
  • [4] [Anonymous], ANTARCTIC ECOSYSTEMS
  • [5] [Anonymous], ED WEEK
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2014, THESIS
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2012, FRAMEWORK K 12 SCI E
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2003, TEXTS SOCIAL EVENTS
  • [9] Ball S.J., 2012, How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools/by Meg Maguire, Stephen J Ball, and Annette Braun with Kate Hoskins and Jane Perryman
  • [10] Ball SJ., 1993, DISCOURSE STUDIES CU, V13, P10, DOI DOI 10.1080/0159630930130203