Prognostic performance of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II in major Croatian hospitals: a prospective multicenter study

被引:5
作者
Desa, Kristian [1 ]
Peric, Mladen [2 ]
Husedzinovic, Ino [3 ]
Sustic, Alan [1 ]
Korusic, Andelko [3 ]
Karadza, Vjekoslav [4 ]
Matlekovic, Drazen [5 ]
Prstec-Veronek, Branka [6 ]
Zuvic-Butorac, Marta [7 ]
Sokolic, Jadranko [1 ]
Siranovic, Mladen [2 ]
Bosnjak, Danica [3 ]
Spicek-Macan, Jasna [4 ]
Gustin, Denis [5 ]
Ozeg-Jakopovic, Drazenka [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Rijeka, Dept Anesthesiol & ICM, Rijeka 351000, Croatia
[2] Sestre Milosrdnice Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Zagreb, Croatia
[3] Dubrava Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Zagreb, Croatia
[4] Jordanovac Univ Hosp Lung Dis, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Zagreb, Croatia
[5] Merkur Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Zagreb, Croatia
[6] Varazdin Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Varazhdin, Croatia
[7] Univ Rijeka, Fac Engn, Rijeka, Croatia
关键词
INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; OUTCOME PREDICTION MODELS; SAPS-II; APACHE-II; SYSTEMS; SEVERITY; COHORT; ILLNESS; ADULT; DATABASE;
D O I
10.3325/cmj.2012.53.442
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim To perform an external validation of the original Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) system and to assess its performance in a selected group of patients in major Croatian hospitals. Methods A prospective, multicenter study was conducted in five university hospitals and one general hospital during a six-month period between November 1, 2007 and May 1, 2008. Standardized hospital mortality ratio (SMR) was calculated from the mean predicted mortality of all the 2756 patients and the actual mortality for the same group of patients. The validation of SAPS II was made using the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), 2 x 2 classification tables, and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests. Results The predicted mortality was as low as 14.6% due to a small proportion of medical patients and the SMR being 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.98). The SAPS II system demonstrated a good discriminatory power as measured by the AUC (0.85; standard error [SE]=0.012; 95% CI = 0.840-0.866; P<0.001). This system significantly overestimated the actual mortality (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit H statistic: X-2=5844; P<0.001 and C statistics: X-8(2)=313.0; P<0.001) in the group of patients included in the study. Conclusion The SAPS II had a good discrimination, but it significantly overestimated the observed mortality in comparison with the predicted mortality in this group of patients in Croatia. Therefore, caution is required when an evaluation is performed at the individual level.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 449
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Performance of standard severity scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients admitted to a respiratory intensive care unit in North India [J].
Aggarwal, AN ;
Sarkar, P ;
Gupta, D ;
Jindal, SK .
RESPIROLOGY, 2006, 11 (02) :196-204
[2]   The performance of SAPS II in a cohort of patients admitted to 99 Italian ICUs: Results from GiViTl [J].
Apolone, G ;
Bertolini, G ;
DAmico, R ;
Iapichino, G ;
Cattaneo, A ;
DeSalvo, G ;
Melotti, RM .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 22 (12) :1368-1378
[3]   Predicting outcome in the intensive care unit using scoring systems - Is new better? A comparison of SAPS and SAPS II in a cohort of 1,393 patients [J].
Bertolini, G ;
D'Amico, R ;
Apolone, G ;
Cattaneo, A ;
Ravizza, A ;
Iapichino, G ;
Brazzi, L ;
Melotti, RM .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (09) :1371-1382
[4]   A COMPARISON OF SEVERITY OF ILLNESS SCORING SYSTEMS FOR INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT PATIENTS - RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER, MULTINATIONAL STUDY [J].
CASTELLA, X ;
ARTIGAS, A ;
BION, J ;
KARI, A ;
BENZER, H ;
HUBER, C ;
ALEXANDER, JP ;
DELANDE, M ;
LEDOUX, D ;
CANIVET, JL ;
DAMAS, P ;
DEMEYER, I ;
VISSERS, K ;
DUGERNIER, T ;
HUYGHENS, L ;
DILTOUR, M ;
DEWIT, N ;
NAGLER, J ;
COOLS, F ;
NOLLET, G ;
VERBEKE, J ;
POELAERT, J ;
COLLARDYN, F ;
LATERRE, PF ;
DOUGNAC, A ;
REYNAERT, M ;
RUTSAERT, R ;
COLEMONT, L ;
SCHETZ, M ;
LAUWERS, P ;
HAMILTON, S ;
NORRIS, C ;
SHUSTACK, A ;
JOHNSTON, R ;
KONOPAD, E ;
HANNONEN, P ;
HERSIO, K ;
KAIRI, P ;
KLOSSNER, J ;
SAARELA, E ;
VAHAMURTO, M ;
ARICE, C ;
BEDOCQ, B ;
BLETTERY, B ;
MISSET, B ;
CARLET, J ;
MIER, L ;
DREYFUSS, D ;
FOSSE, JP ;
GARO, B .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1995, 23 (08) :1327-1335
[5]   Benchmarking in critical care - The road ahead [J].
Glance, LG ;
Szalados, JE .
CHEST, 2002, 121 (02) :326-328
[6]   Outcome of intensive care patients in a group of British intensive care units [J].
Goldhill, DR ;
Sumner, A .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (08) :1337-1345
[7]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[8]  
Hariharan S, 2007, W INDIAN MED J, V56, P144
[9]   Recalibration of risk prediction models in a large multicenter cohort of admissions to adult, general critical care units in the United Kingdom [J].
Harrison, DA ;
Brady, AR ;
Parry, GJ ;
Carpenter, JR ;
Rowan, K .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (05) :1378-1388
[10]   Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) scoring systems in a single Greek intensive care unit [J].
Katsaragakis, S ;
Papadimitropoulos, K ;
Antonakis, P ;
Strergiopoulos, S ;
Konstadoulakis, MM ;
Androulakis, G .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (02) :426-432