The effect of strategic and operating turnaround initiatives on audit reporting for distressed companies

被引:23
作者
Bruynseels, Liesbeth [2 ]
Willekens, Marleen [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Tilburg Univ, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
BUSINESS RISK AUDIT; FIRM INDUSTRY SPECIALIZATION; CONCERN OPINION DECISION; NONAUDIT SERVICE FEES; BANKRUPT COMPANIES; FINANCIAL DISTRESS; PROBIT MODELS; QUALITY; MARKET; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.aos.2012.03.001
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Empirical research on the effect of turnaround initiatives on audit reporting is scant. This paper addresses this gap by examining audit reporting for distressed companies and its association with a broad array of strategic and operating turnaround initiatives. In particular, we study the association between business risk information and going-concern decisions for distressed clients. Using a sample of distressed firms in the US manufacturing industry, we find that both short-term cash flow potential as well as strategic growth and hence long-term cash flow potential are necessary for strategic turnaround initiatives to have a mitigating impact on the auditor's going-concern decision. Strategic turnaround initiatives for which only one of these two conditions holds and operating turnaround initiatives appear to function as going-concern risk factors as they are associated with a higher likelihood that a going-concern opinion will be issued. We also find that specialist and non-specialist auditors assess the mitigating potential of some but not all turnaround initiatives differently. Overall, our results suggest that auditors' strategic risk assessment (typically done in a business risk auditing context) is associated with the outcome of the audit process (the opinion). (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 241
页数:19
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Interaction terms in logit and probit models [J].
Ai, CR ;
Norton, EC .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2003, 80 (01) :123-129
[2]  
AICPA, 1988, STAT AUD STAND 59 AU
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Journal of Business Finance Accounting
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ACCOUNT HORIZ
[5]   Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality [J].
Balsam, S ;
Krishnan, J ;
Yang, JS .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2003, 22 (02) :71-97
[6]  
Barker VL, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V18, P13, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199701)18:1<13::AID-SMJ843>3.3.CO
[7]  
2-O
[8]   RETRENCHMENT - CAUSE OF TURNAROUND OR CONSEQUENCE OF DECLINE [J].
BARKER, VL ;
MONE, MA .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1994, 15 (05) :395-405
[9]   Further evidence on the auditor's going-concern report: The influence of management plans [J].
Behn, BK ;
Kaplan, SE ;
Krumwiede, KR .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2001, 20 (01) :13-28
[10]  
Bell T.B., 1997, AUDITING ORG STRATEG