Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment: A Primer for Social Workers

被引:46
作者
Messing, Jill Theresa [1 ]
Thaller, Jonel [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Social Work, Phoenix, AZ 85004 USA
关键词
Domestic violence; evidence-based practice; intimate partner violence; risk; risk assessment; risk factors; WIFE ASSAULT RECIDIVISM; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; SPOUSAL ASSAULT; DANGER ASSESSMENT; ACTUARIAL ASSESSMENT; GLOBAL PREVALENCE; MENTAL-HEALTH; HOMICIDE; VALIDATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1093/bjsw/bcu012
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Social workers are likely to encounter intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors and/or perpetrators within their practice due to the prevalence of this social issue and the negative health and mental health consequences resulting from it. IPV risk assessments can be utilised by social workers in multiple service settings. A recent meta-analysis provided information on the IPV risk assessment instruments with the greatest predictive accuracy, but social workers need to know the most appropriate IPV risk assessment tools for use in their particular practice settings. Therefore, this paper provides social workers with summary information on the four risk assessment instruments that have the highest predictive accuracy-the Danger Assessment, the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment, the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment, and the Domestic Violence Screening Inventory. For social workers unable to use validated risk assessments, a summary of the risk factors is provided with a focus on opportunities for change within violent relationships. Finally, recommendations for which IPV risk assessment to use in various social work practice settings are outlined. The use of IPV risk assessment should be situated within an evidence-based practice framework, taking into account the best evidence of risk for future harm, clinical expertise and client self-determination.
引用
收藏
页码:1804 / 1820
页数:17
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
AEgisdottir S., 2006, COUNS PSYCHOL, V34, P383
[2]  
Pueyo AA, 2008, PAPEL PSICOL, V29, P107
[3]   CLASSIFICATION FOR EFFECTIVE REHABILITATION - REDISCOVERING PSYCHOLOGY [J].
ANDREWS, DA ;
BONTA, J ;
HOGE, RD .
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 1990, 17 (01) :19-52
[4]   The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment [J].
Andrews, DA ;
Bonta, J ;
Wormith, JS .
CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 2006, 52 (01) :7-27
[5]  
[Anonymous], VALIDATION STUDY DOM
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1997, INTIMATE PARTNER HOM
[7]   Experiences of seeking help from health professionals in a sample of women who experienced domestic violence [J].
Bacchus, L ;
Mezey, G ;
Bewley, S .
HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2003, 11 (01) :10-18
[8]   Assessing the risk of future psychological abuse: Predicting the accuracy of battered women's predictions [J].
Bell, Margret E. ;
Cattaneo, Lauren Bennett ;
Goodman, Lisa A. ;
Dutton, Mary Ann .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY VIOLENCE, 2008, 23 (02) :69-80
[9]  
Bennett L., 2000, VIOLENCE AGAINST WOM, V6, P1190, DOI DOI 10.1177/10778010022183596
[10]   Teaching Social Work Students to Resolve Ethical Dilemmas in Domestic Violence [J].
Bent-Goodley, Tricia B. .
JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN SOCIAL WORK, 2007, 27 (1-2) :73-88