Ambient characterisation of PurpleAir particulate matter monitors for measurements to be considered as indicative

被引:4
作者
Caseiro, Alexandre [1 ]
Schmitz, Sean [1 ]
Villena, Guillermo [1 ,2 ]
Jagatha, Janani Venkatraman [3 ]
von Schneidemesser, Erika [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Adv Sustainabil Studies, Berliner Str 130, D-14467 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Univ Wuppertal, Inst Atmospher & Environm Res, Wuppertal, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Geograph Inst, Berlin, Germany
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-ATMOSPHERES | 2022年 / 2卷 / 06期
关键词
AIR-QUALITY MICROSENSORS; LOW-COST; LABORATORY EVALUATION; FIELD CALIBRATION; SENSORS; POLLUTION; EXPOSURE; PM2.5; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1039/d2ea00085g
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Low-cost particulate matter systems output airborne particle mass concentrations based on optical particle counter sensors. Because the relationship between the particle number and mass is complex and varies with time and space, the research community has developed correction methodologies which imply co-locating a low-cost system and a reference-grade instrument. Such a requirement may not always be achievable. This work aims at supporting users unable to perform co-locations for calibration, providing characterization in terms of indicative measurements. Nine different PurpleAir units in total were deployed (up to 8 units at a time) in parallel with a GRIMM monitor during three different measurement periods in the cities of Berlin and Potsdam, Germany. The three measurement periods encompass over 80 days in total and span from December 2017 to July 2019. We compare the low cost systems' performances against the research-grade measurements and investigate the transferability of correction functions between systems and campaigns. Given the specificity of the correction functions (systems and campaigns), we explore the possibility of their use as indicative measurements under the European legislation specifications as a function of temperature and relative humidity. The results are compiled into a database, the PurpleAir bidimensional look-up matrix, BLUM-i, that is freely available and comes with software for the analysis of PurpleAir uncalibrated data. The BLUM-i is designed as an open-source database application to provide the probability that measurements meet the criteria for indicative measurements as defined in European legislation. The BLUM-i can be continually improved by including more data.
引用
收藏
页码:1400 / 1410
页数:11
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Higher Judicial council bulletins on amnesty rulings
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, ASS AIR QUAL CIT SCI, DOI 10.2800/619
[3]   Laboratory Evaluation of the Shinyei PPD42NS Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensor [J].
Austin, Elena ;
Novosselov, Igor ;
Seto, Edmund ;
Yost, Michael G. .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (09)
[4]   Introduction to Empowered Partnerships: Community-Based Participatory Action Research for Environmental Justice [J].
Bacon, Christopher ;
deVuono-Powell, Saneta ;
Frampton, Mary Louise ;
LoPresti, Tony ;
Pannu, Camille .
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, 2013, 6 (01) :1-8
[5]   Regression methods in the calibration of low-cost sensors for ambient particulate matter measurements [J].
Badura, Marek ;
Batog, Piotr ;
Drzeniecka-Osiadacz, Anetta ;
Modzel, Piotr .
SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2019, 1 (06)
[6]   Development and application of a United States-wide correction for PM2.5 data collected with the PurpleAir sensor [J].
Barkjohn, Karoline K. ;
Gantt, Brett ;
Clements, Andrea L. .
ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2021, 14 (06) :4617-4637
[7]   Assessment of air quality microsensors versus reference methods: The EuNetAir Joint Exercise - Part II [J].
Borrego, C. ;
Ginja, J. ;
Coutinho, M. ;
Ribeiro, C. ;
Karatzas, K. ;
Sioumis, Th ;
Katsifarakis, N. ;
Konstantinidis, K. ;
De Vito, S. ;
Esposito, E. ;
Salvato, M. ;
Smith, P. ;
Andre, N. ;
Gerard, P. ;
Francis, L. A. ;
Castell, N. ;
Schneider, P. ;
Viana, M. ;
Minguillon, M. C. ;
Reimringer, W. ;
Otjes, R. P. ;
von Sicard, O. ;
Pohle, R. ;
Elen, B. ;
Suriano, D. ;
Pfister, V ;
Prato, M. ;
Dipinto, S. ;
Penza, M. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 193 :127-142
[8]   Assessment of air quality microsensors versus reference methods: The EuNetAir joint exercise [J].
Borrego, C. ;
Costa, A. M. ;
Ginja, J. ;
Amorim, M. ;
Coutinho, M. ;
Karatzas, K. ;
Sioumis, Th. ;
Katsifarakis, N. ;
Konstantinidis, K. ;
De Vito, S. ;
Esposito, E. ;
Smith, P. ;
Andre, N. ;
Gerard, P. ;
Francis, L. A. ;
Castell, N. ;
Schneider, P. ;
Viana, M. ;
Minguillon, M. C. ;
Reimringer, W. ;
Otjes, R. P. ;
von Sicard, O. ;
Pohle, R. ;
Elen, B. ;
Suriano, D. ;
Pfister, V. ;
Prato, M. ;
Dipinto, S. ;
Penza, M. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 147 :246-263
[9]   Stationary and portable multipollutant monitors for high-spatiotemporal-resolution air quality studies including online calibration [J].
Buehler, Colby ;
Xiong, Fulizi ;
Zamora, Misti Levy ;
Skog, Kate M. ;
Kohrman-Glaser, Joseph ;
Colton, Stefan ;
McNamara, Michael ;
Ryan, Kevin ;
Redlich, Carrie ;
Bartos, Matthew ;
Wong, Brandon ;
Kerkez, Branko ;
Koehler, Kirsten ;
Gentner, Drew R. .
ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2021, 14 (02) :995-1013
[10]   Long-term field comparison of multiple low-cost particulate matter sensors in an outdoor urban environment [J].
Bulot, Florentin M. J. ;
Johnston, Steven J. ;
Basford, Philip J. ;
Easton, Natasha H. C. ;
Apetroaie-Cristea, Mihaela ;
Foster, Gavin L. ;
Morris, Andrew K. R. ;
Cox, Simon J. ;
Loxham, Matthew .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)