Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis

被引:549
作者
Hsee, CK
Loewenstein, GF
Blount, S
Bazerman, MH
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Grad Sch Business, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Social & Decis Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch, Evanston, IL USA
[4] Harvard Business Sch, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.576
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Arguably, all judgments and decisions are made in 1 (or some combination) of 2 basic evaluation modes-joint evaluation mode (JE), in which multiple options are presented simultaneously and evaluated comparatively, or separate evaluation mode (SE), in which options are presented in isolation and evaluated separately. This article reviews recent literature showing that people evaluate options differently and exhibit reversals of preferences for options between JE and SE. The authors propose an explanation for the JE/SE reversal based on a principle called the evaluability hypothesis. The hypothesis posits that it is more difficult to evaluate the desirability of values on some attributes than on others and that, compared with easy-to-evaluate attributes, difficult-to-evaluate attributes have a greater impact in JE than in SE.
引用
收藏
页码:576 / 590
页数:15
相关论文
共 69 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], PREFERENCE REVERSALS
[3]  
Ariely D, 1998, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V11, P19, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199803)11:1<19::AID-BDM277>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-B
[5]   Confusion of relative and absolute risk in valuation [J].
Baron, J .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1997, 14 (03) :301-309
[6]  
Baron J., 1988, THINKING DECIDING
[7]   THE INCONSISTENT ROLE OF COMPARISON OTHERS AND PROCEDURAL JUSTICE IN REACTIONS TO HYPOTHETICAL JOB DESCRIPTIONS - IMPLICATIONS FOR JOB ACCEPTANCE DECISIONS [J].
BAZERMAN, MH ;
SCHROTH, HA ;
SHAH, PP ;
DIEKMANN, KA ;
TENBRUNSEL, AE .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1994, 60 (03) :326-352
[8]   Negotiating with yourself and losing: Making decisions with competing internal preferences [J].
Bazerman, MH ;
Tenbrunsel, AE ;
Wade-Benzoni, K .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (02) :225-241
[9]   REVERSALS OF PREFERENCE IN ALLOCATION DECISIONS - JUDGING AN ALTERNATIVE VERSUS CHOOSING AMONG ALTERNATIVES [J].
BAZERMAN, MH ;
LOEWENSTEIN, GF ;
WHITE, SB .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1992, 37 (02) :220-240
[10]   INVESTIGATING THE EFFECT OF STIMULUS RANGE ON ATTRIBUTE WEIGHT [J].
BEATTIE, J ;
BARON, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1991, 17 (02) :571-585