Increased genetic gains in sheep, beef and dairy breeding programs from using female reproductive technologies combined with optimal contribution selection and genomic breeding values

被引:61
作者
Granleese, Tom [1 ,2 ]
Clark, Samuel A. [2 ]
Swan, Andrew A. [1 ,3 ]
van der Werf, Julius H. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sheep Cooperat Res Ctr, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
[2] Univ New England, Sch Environm & Rural Sci, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
[3] Anim Genet & Breeding Unit, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
关键词
EMBRYO-TRANSFER; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MULTIPLE OVULATION; MARKER HAPLOTYPES; PREDEFINED RATE; CATTLE; PREDICTION; ACCURACY; DESIGNS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12711-015-0151-3
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Background: Female reproductive technologies such as multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) and juvenile in vitro embryo production and embryo transfer (JIVET) can boost rates of genetic gain but they can also increase rates of inbreeding. Inbreeding can be managed using the principles of optimal contribution selection (OCS), which maximizes genetic gain while placing a penalty on the rate of inbreeding. We evaluated the potential benefits and synergies that exist between genomic selection (GS) and reproductive technologies under OCS for sheep and cattle breeding programs. Methods: Various breeding program scenarios were simulated stochastically including: (1) a sheep breeding program for the selection of a single trait that could be measured either early or late in life; (2) a beef breeding program with an early or late trait; and (3) a dairy breeding program with a sex limited trait. OCS was applied using a range of penalties (severe to no penalty) on co-ancestry of selection candidates, with the possibility of using multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) and/or juvenile in vitro embryo production and embryo transfer (JIVET) for females. Each breeding program was simulated with and without genomic selection. Results: All breeding programs could be penalized to result in an inbreeding rate of 1 % increase per generation. The addition of MOET to artificial insemination or natural breeding (AI/N), without the use of GS yielded an extra 25 to 60 % genetic gain. The further addition of JIVET did not yield an extra genetic gain. When GS was used, MOET and MOET + JIVET programs increased rates of genetic gain by 38 to 76 % and 51 to 81 % compared to AI/N, respectively. Conclusions: Large increases in genetic gain were found across species when female reproductive technologies combined with genomic selection were applied and inbreeding was managed, especially for breeding programs that focus on the selection of traits measured late in life or that are sex-limited. Optimal contribution selection was an effective tool to optimally allocate different combinations of reproductive technologies. Applying a range of penalties to co-ancestry of selection candidates allows a comprehensive exploration of the inbreeding vs. genetic gain space.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Advances in production of embryos in vitro from juvenile and prepubertal oocytes from the calf and lamb [J].
Armstrong, DT ;
Kotaras, PJ ;
Earl, CR .
REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 1997, 9 (03) :333-339
[2]   Accuracies of estimated breeding values from ordinary genetic evaluations do not reflect the correlation between true and estimated breeding values in selected populations [J].
Bijma, P. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2012, 129 (05) :345-358
[3]  
Bijma P., 2000, PhD Thesis
[4]   Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle [J].
Bolormaa, S. ;
Pryce, J. E. ;
Kemper, K. ;
Savin, K. ;
Hayes, B. J. ;
Barendse, W. ;
Zhang, Y. ;
Reich, C. M. ;
Mason, B. A. ;
Bunch, R. J. ;
Harrison, B. E. ;
Reverter, A. ;
Herd, R. M. ;
Tier, B. ;
Graser, H. -U. ;
Goddard, M. E. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (07) :3088-3104
[5]   Use of MOET in Merino breeding programmes: A practical and economic appraisal [J].
Brash, LD ;
Wray, NR ;
Goddard, ME .
ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1996, 62 :241-254
[6]   Genomic selection strategies in dairy cattle: Strong positive interaction between use of genotypic information and intensive use of young bulls on genetic gain [J].
Buch, L. H. ;
Sorensen, M. K. ;
Berg, P. ;
Pedersen, L. D. ;
Sorensen, A. C. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2012, 129 (02) :138-151
[7]   Relationships among milk yield, body condition, cow weight, and reproduction in spring-calved Holstein-Friesians [J].
Buckley, F ;
O'Sullivan, K ;
Mee, JF ;
Evans, RD ;
Dillon, P .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2003, 86 (07) :2308-2319
[8]   EFFECT OF SELECTION ON GENETIC VARIABILITY [J].
BULMER, MG .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1971, 105 (943) :201-+
[9]  
Bunter K. L., 2013, Proceedings of the Twentieth Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Translating Science into Action, Napier, New Zealand, 20th-23rd October 2013, P82
[10]   The effect of genomic information on optimal contribution selection in livestock breeding programs [J].
Clark, Samuel A. ;
Kinghorn, Brian P. ;
Hickey, John M. ;
van der Werf, Julius H. J. .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2013, 45