Microtensile dentin bond strength of self-etching resins: Effect of a hydrophobic layer

被引:50
作者
Brackett, WW
Ito, S
Tay, FR
Haisch, LD
Pashley, DH
机构
[1] Med Coll Georgia, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Rehabil, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[2] Hlth Sci Univ Hokkaido, Sch Dent, Dept Operat Dent & Endodontol, Ishikari, Hokkaido, Japan
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Dent, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Nebraska, Med Ctr, Coll Dent, Dept Adult Restorat Dent, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[5] Med Coll Georgia, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Biol & Maxillofacial Pathol, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2341/04-152
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
In this study, the microtensile bond strength of resin composites to dentin was determined when hydrophilic self-etching resins were used with and without an additional layer of a more hydrophobic adhesive. Included were three single-step self-etching adhesives, Adper Prompt L-Pop (3M ESPE), iBond GI (Heraeus Kulzer, Inc) and Xeno M (Caulk/Dentsply), and as a negative control, UniFil Bond (GC America), a self-etching primer with a separate adhesive. Each product was evaluated using a hybrid resin composite from its respective manufacturer, and each was used as directed and then used with an added layer of a more hydrophobic resin from its respective manufacturer. Testing was performed after 72 hours using a "non-trimming" microtensile test at a crosshead speed of 0.6 mm/minute. When the products were used according to manufacturers' directions, iBond had a significantly higher bond strength to dentin than the other three products (p<0.001), which were not significantly different from each other. For the three self-etching adhesive systems, the addition of a layer of a more hydrophobic resin produced significantly higher bond strengths to dentin (p<0.001), while no significant effect was found for the self-etching primer (p = 0.40). A significant interaction was found between the variables product and adhesive treatment. The TEM evaluation of Prompt L-Pop and iBond demonstrated reduced nanoleakage with the additional resin layer.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 738
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Armstrong SR, 2003, J ADHES DENT, V5, P47
[2]   Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems [J].
Bouillaguet, S ;
Gysi, P ;
Wataha, JC ;
Ciucchi, B ;
Cattani, M ;
Godin, C ;
Meyer, JM .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2001, 29 (01) :55-61
[3]   The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite [J].
Choi, KK ;
Condon, JR ;
Ferracane, JL .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 (03) :812-817
[4]  
Inoue S, 2001, J Adhes Dent, V3, P237
[5]   SOME EFFECTS OF WATER ON DENTIN BONDING [J].
JACOBSEN, T ;
SODERHOLM, KJ .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1995, 11 (02) :132-136
[6]  
Molla Karlheinz, 2002, J Adhes Dent, V4, P171
[7]  
Nakabayashi N, 1992, Quintessence Int, V23, P135
[8]  
Pashley D H, 1999, J Adhes Dent, V1, P299
[9]   Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array [J].
Shono, Y ;
Ogawa, T ;
Terashita, M ;
Carvalho, RM ;
Pashley, EL ;
Pashley, DH .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1999, 78 (02) :699-705
[10]  
Suh BI, 2003, J ADHES DENT, V5, P267