Imaging the subsurface using induced seismicity and ambient noise: 3-D tomographic Monte Carlo joint inversion of earthquake body wave traveltimes and surface wave dispersion

被引:19
|
作者
Zhang, Xin [1 ]
Roy, Corinna [2 ]
Curtis, Andrew [1 ,3 ]
Nowacki, Andy [2 ]
Baptie, Brian [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Geosci, Edinburgh EH9 3FE, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Earth Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] British Geol Survey, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Joint inversion; Induced seismicity; SHEAR-VELOCITY STRUCTURE; RECEIVER FUNCTIONS; ARRIVAL TIMES; UNITED-STATES; LOMA-PRIETA; LITHOSPHERE; BENEATH; IMAGES; NOTTINGHAMSHIRE; FILTERS;
D O I
10.1093/gji/ggaa230
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Seismic body wave traveltime tomography and surface wave dispersion tomography have been used widely to characterize earthquakes and to study the subsurface structure of the Earth. Since these types of problem are often significantly non-linear and have non-unique solutions, Markov chain Monte Carlo methods have been used to find probabilistic solutions. Body and surface wave data are usually inverted separately to produce independent velocity models. However, body wave tomography is generally sensitive to structure around the subvolume in which earthquakes occur and produces limited resolution in the shallower Earth, whereas surface wave tomography is often sensitive to shallower structure. To better estimate subsurface properties, we therefore jointly invert for the seismic velocity structure and earthquake locations using body and surface wave data simultaneously. We apply the new joint inversion method to a mining site in the United Kingdom at which induced seismicity occurred and was recorded on a small local network of stations, and where ambient noise recordings are available from the same stations. The ambient noise is processed to obtain inter-receiver surface wave dispersion measurements which are inverted jointly with body wave arrival times from local earthquakes. The results show that by using both types of data, the earthquake source parameters and the velocity structure can be better constrained than in independent inversions. To further understand and interpret the results, we conduct synthetic tests to compare the results from body wave inversion and joint inversion. The results show that trade-offs between source parameters and velocities appear to bias results if only body wave data are used, but this issue is largely resolved by using the joint inversion method. Thus the use of ambient seismic noise and our fully non-linear inversion provides a valuable, improved method to image the subsurface velocity and seismicity.
引用
收藏
页码:1639 / 1655
页数:17
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Joint inversion of surface wave dispersion and receiver functions: a Bayesian Monte-Carlo approach
    Shen, Weisen
    Ritzwoller, Michael H.
    Schulte-Pelkum, Vera
    Lin, Fan-Chi
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 192 (02) : 807 - 836
  • [2] 3-D S Wave Imaging via Robust Neural Network Interpolation of 2-D Profiles From Wave-Equation Dispersion Inversion of Seismic Ambient Noise
    Chen, Yuqing
    Saygin, Erdinc
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2022, 127 (12)
  • [3] Subsurface Profile Mapping using 3-D Compressive Wave Imaging
    Hazreek, Z. A. M.
    Faizal, T. B. M.
    Aziman, M.
    Azhar, A. T. S.
    Rosli, S.
    Ashraf, M. I. M.
    Hafizan, S. M.
    6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EURO ASIA CIVIL ENGINEERING FORUM (EACEF 2017), 2017, 138
  • [4] 3D Seismic Velocity Models for Alaska from Joint Tomographic Inversion of Body-Wave and Surface-Wave Data
    Nayak, Avinash
    Eberhart-Phillips, Donna
    Ruppert, Natalia A.
    Fang, Hongjian
    Moore, Melissa M.
    Tape, Carl
    Christensen, Douglas H.
    Abers, Geoffrey A.
    Thurber, Clifford H.
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 91 (06) : 3106 - 3119
  • [5] 3D S-wave velocity imaging of a subsurface disturbed by mining using ambient seismic noise
    Czarny, Rafal
    Pilecki, Zenon
    Nakata, Nori
    Pilecka, Elzbieta
    Krawiec, Krzysztof
    Harba, Paulina
    Barnas, Maciej
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2019, 251 : 115 - 127
  • [6] WAVE-FIELD EXTRAPOLATION OF BODY WAVES FOR 3-D IMAGING OF EARTHQUAKE SOURCES
    CHANG, WF
    MCMECHAN, GA
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 1991, 106 (01) : 85 - 98
  • [7] Crustal and upper mantle 3-D Vs structure of the Pannonian region from joint earthquake and ambient noise Rayleigh wave tomography
    Timko, M.
    El-Sharkawy, A.
    Wiesenberg, L.
    Fodor, L.
    Weber, Z.
    Lebedev, S.
    Eckel, F.
    Meier, T.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 239 (02) : 1313 - 1334
  • [8] 3-D structure of the Rio Grande Rift from 1-D constrained joint inversion of receiver functions and surface wave dispersion
    Sosa, Anibal
    Thompson, Lennox
    Velasco, Aaron A.
    Romero, Rodrigo
    Herrmann, Robert B.
    EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2014, 402 : 127 - 137
  • [9] Joint inversion of linear array ambient noise surface-wave and teleseismic body-wave data based on an adjoint-state method
    Zhang Chao
    Yao HuaJian
    Tong Ping
    Liu QinYa
    Lei Ting
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2020, 63 (11): : 4065 - 4079
  • [10] A 3-D model of the crust and uppermost mantle beneath the Central and Western US by joint inversion of receiver functions and surface wave dispersion
    Shen, Weisen
    Ritzwoller, Michael H.
    Schulte-Pelkum, Vera
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2013, 118 (01) : 262 - 276