Commonalities between perception and cognition

被引:52
作者
Tacca, Michela C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Dept Philosophy, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
systematicity; generality constraint; conceptual content; non-conceptual content; attention; VISUAL-ATTENTION; SYSTEMATICITY; SYNCHRONIZATION; CONNECTIONISM; INTEGRATION; AWARENESS; BINDING; OBJECT;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00358
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Perception and cognition are highly interrelated. Given the influence that these systems exert on one another, it is important to explain how perceptual representations and cognitive representations interact. In this paper, I analyze the similarities between visual perceptual representations and cognitive representations in terms of their structural properties and content. Specifically, I argue that the spatial structure underlying visual object representation displays systematicity a property that is considered to be characteristic of propositional cognitive representations. To this end, I propose a logical characterization of visual feature binding as described by Treisman's Feature Integration Theory and argue that systematicity is not only a property of language-like representations, but also of spatially organized visual representations. Furthermore, I argue that if systematicity is taken to be a criterion to distinguish between conceptual and non-conceptual representations, then visual representations, that display systematicity, might count as an early type of conceptual representations. Showing these analogies between visual perception and cognition is an important step toward understanding the interface between the two systems. The ideas here presented might also set the stage for new empirical studies that directly compare binding (and other relational operations) in visual perception and higher cognition.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Furnishing the Mind. Concepts and their Perceptual Basis
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Visual perception
[3]   Enzymatic computation and cognitive modularity [J].
Barrett, HC .
MIND & LANGUAGE, 2005, 20 (03) :259-287
[4]  
Barsalou LW, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P577, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X99532147
[5]   WHAT IS AT STAKE IN THE DEBATE ON NONCONCEPTUAL CONTENT? [J].
Bermudez, Jose Luis .
PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 21 (01) :55-72
[6]  
Bermudez JoseLuis., 2011, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, VSpring 2012
[7]   Tracking an object through feature space [J].
Blaser, E ;
Pylyshyn, ZW ;
Holcombe, AO .
NATURE, 2000, 408 (6809) :196-199
[8]   Two neural correlates of consciousness [J].
Block, N .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2005, 9 (02) :46-52
[9]   The theory-ladenness of observation and the theory-ladenness of the rest of the scientific process [J].
Brewer, WF ;
Lambert, BL .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2001, 68 (03) :S176-S186
[10]   Putting Thoughts to Work: Concepts, Systematicity, and Stimulus-Independence [J].
Camp, Elisabeth .
PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 78 (02) :275-311