Young people's conceptions of trust and confidence in the crime control system: Differences between public and private policing

被引:14
作者
Saarikkomaki, Elsa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Focus groups; police; private security guards; procedural justice; trust; youth; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; SECURITY GUARDS; YOUTH; LEGITIMACY; PERCEPTIONS; ENCOUNTERS;
D O I
10.1177/1748895817700695
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Private security increasingly participates in policing, thus changing the field of policing. However, there is a lack of research on how private security is perceived by citizens, and particularly by young people. This article reports on a novel approach to studying procedural justice and trust; it compares young people's perceptions of public and private policing. Relying on focus group data from Finland, the findings indicated that young people have more trust and confidence in the police than in private security guards. Their perceptions were based on face-to-face encounters (to measure trust') and on general assumptions (to measure confidence'). Young people perceived the police as more educated, professional, legitimate and respectful than security guards. They also felt that security guards sometimes exceed their legal rights and act unfairly. However, the findings also suggest that security guards have some legitimacy. The study suggests that issues around trust in policing are more complex than prior research indicates and that private security cannot replace police tasks without it affecting perceptions of trust in policing.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 172
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Domestication by cappuccino or a revenge on urban space?: Control and empowerment in the management of public spaces [J].
Atkinson, R .
URBAN STUDIES, 2003, 40 (09) :1829-1843
[2]   The future of policing [J].
Bayley, DH ;
Shearing, CD .
LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW, 1996, 30 (03) :585-606
[3]  
Bradford B, 2008, 1303567 SSRN ID
[4]   Triggers of change to public confidence in the police and criminal justice system: Findings from the Crime Survey for England and Wales panel experiment [J].
Bradford, Ben ;
Myhill, Andy .
CRIMINOLOGY & CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2015, 15 (01) :23-43
[5]  
Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[6]  
Button M., 2002, Private Policing
[7]   Criminalizing Sociability through Anti-social Behaviour Legislation: Dispersal Powers, Young People and the Police [J].
Crawford, Adam .
YOUTH JUSTICE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (01) :5-26
[8]   Police-youth relationships: A qualitative analysis of Flemish adolescents' attitudes toward the police [J].
Dirikx, Astrid ;
Gelders, Dave ;
Parmentier, Stephan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2012, 9 (02) :191-205
[9]   Legal Socialization of Children and Adolescents [J].
Fagan, Jeffrey ;
Tyler, Tom R. .
SOCIAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, 2005, 18 (03) :217-242
[10]   Anything can happen with police around: Urban youth evaluate strategies of surveillance in public places [J].
Fine, M ;
Freudenberg, N ;
Payne, Y ;
Perkins, T ;
Smith, K ;
Wanzer, K .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2003, 59 (01) :141-158