Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation A prospective randomized controlled study

被引:3
作者
Kim, Kyung Mi [1 ]
Seo, Kwon Hui [2 ]
Kim, You Jung [3 ]
John, Hyunji [3 ]
Moon, Hyun Soo [3 ]
Kim, Namhyun [3 ]
Yeon, Nayoung [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Asan Med Ctr, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Yeouido St Marys Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Hallym Univ, Hallym Univ Sacred Heart Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Sch Med, Anyang, South Korea
关键词
C-MAC video laryngoscope; double lumen tube; hemodynamic changes; intratracheal; intubation; McCoy laryngoscope; MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE; DIFFICULTY; AIRTRAQ; AIRWAY; SCORE;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000031775
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Inserting a double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) poses more challenge than inserting a single-lumen tube. The C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope is a useful alternative to the direct laryngoscope. However, no study has compared its performance with that of the McCoy laryngoscope, which has a hyperangulated blade tip similar to that of the C-MAC D-blade. We aimed to compare the performance of the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope with that of the McCoy laryngoscope in DLT intubation. Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled study, 90 patients requiring DLT intubation were randomly allocated to either the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope group (group C, n=47) or McCoy laryngoscope group (group M, n=43). During intubation, the percentage of glottic opening, modified Cormack-Lehane grade, time taken for intubation, malposition of the bronchial lumen, and hemodynamic parameters were recorded. After intubation, we assessed the intubation difficulty scale score and, a postoperative sore throat in the recovery room. Results: The time taken for intubation was 35.8510.77 seconds and 33.18 +/- 11.97 seconds in groups C and M, respectively (P=.269). The modified Cormack-Lehane grade was significantly lower in group C than in group M (P=.000). Percentage of glottic opening was significantly higher in group C (79.36 +/- 13.42%) than in group M (53.49 +/- 29.83%) (P=.000). The intubation difficulty scale score was significantly lower in group C than in group M (P=.030). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of malposition status, hemodynamic parameters, or visual analog scale score for a postoperative sore throat. Conclusion: Although the time taken for intubation was comparable between the 2 intubation devices, the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope facilitated glottis visualization and reduced the intubation difficulty scale better than the McCoy laryngoscope in patients undergoing DLT intubation.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   The intubation difficulty scale (IDS) - Proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation [J].
Adnet, F ;
Borron, SW ;
Racine, SX ;
Clemessy, JL ;
Fournier, JL ;
Plaisance, P ;
Lapandry, C .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (06) :1290-1297
[2]   CRITERIA FOR ESTIMATING LIKELIHOOD OF DIFFICULTY OF ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION WITH THE MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE [J].
BELLHOUSE, CP ;
DORE, C .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1988, 16 (03) :329-337
[3]   Sequential rotation to insert a left double-lumen endotracheal tube using the GlideScopeA® [J].
Bustamante, Sergio ;
Parra-Sanchez, Ivan ;
Apostolakis, John .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2010, 57 (03) :282-283
[4]   First Clinical Evaluation of the C-MAC D-Blade Videolaryngoscope During Routine and Difficult Intubation [J].
Cavus, Erol ;
Neumann, Tobias ;
Doerges, Volker ;
Moeller, Thora ;
Scharf, Edwin ;
Wagner, Klaus ;
Bein, Berthold ;
Serocki, Goetz .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 112 (02) :382-385
[5]   GlideScope® versus C-MAC®(D) videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for double lumen endotracheal intubation in patients with predicted normal airways: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial [J].
Huang, Ping ;
Zhou, Renlong ;
Lu, Zhixing ;
Hang, Yannan ;
Wang, Shanjuan ;
Huang, Zhenling .
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
[6]  
Jain Divya, 2016, J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, V32, P59, DOI 10.4103/0970-9185.173349
[7]   Efficacy and Safety of Video-Laryngoscopy versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Double-Lumen Endotracheal Intubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Karczewska, Katarzyna ;
Bialka, Szymon ;
Smereka, Jacek ;
Cyran, Maciej ;
Nowak-Starz, Grazyna ;
Chmielewski, Jaroslaw ;
Pruc, Michal ;
Wieczorek, Pawel ;
Peacock, Frank William ;
Ladny, Jerzy Robert ;
Szarpak, Lukasz .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (23)
[8]   Seeing is believing: getting the best out of videolaryngoscopy [J].
Kelly, F. E. ;
Cook, T. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 117 :9-+
[9]   Comparison of the C-MAC D-Blade, Conventional C-MAC, and Macintosh Laryngoscopes in Simulated Easy and Difficult Airways [J].
Kilicaslan, Alper ;
Topal, Ahmet ;
Erol, Atilla ;
Uzun, Sema Tuncer .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2014, 42 (04) :182-189
[10]   Different classes of videoscopes and direct laryngoscopes for double-lumen tube intubation in thoracic surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis [J].
Kim, Young Sung ;
Song, Jihyun ;
Lim, Byung Gun ;
Lee, Il Ok ;
Won, Young Ju .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (08)