Gauging the likelihood of stable cavitation from ultrasound contrast agents

被引:109
作者
Bader, Kenneth B. [1 ]
Holland, Christy K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
BLOOD-BRAIN-BARRIER; FOCUSED ULTRASOUND; GAS-BUBBLES; IN-VITRO; MICROBUBBLES; DISRUPTION; EXPOSURE; OSCILLATIONS; DESTRUCTION; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/58/1/127
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The mechanical index (MI) was formulated to gauge the likelihood of adverse bioeffects from inertial cavitation. However, the MI formulation did not consider bubble activity from stable cavitation. This type of bubble activity can be readily nucleated from ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) and has the potential to promote beneficial bioeffects. Here, the presence of stable cavitation is determined numerically by tracking the onset of subharmonic oscillations within a population of bubbles for frequencies up to 7 MHz and peak rarefactional pressures up to 3 MPa. In addition, the acoustic pressure rupture threshold of an UCA population was determined using the Marmottant model. The threshold for subharmonic emissions of optimally sized bubbles was found to be lower than the inertial cavitation threshold for all frequencies studied. The rupture thresholds of optimally sized UCAs were found to be lower than the threshold for subharmonic emissions for either single cycle or steady state acoustic excitations. Because the thresholds of both subharmonic emissions and UCA rupture are linearly dependent on frequency, an index of the form I-CAV = P-r/f (where P-r is the peak rarefactional pressure in MPa and f is the frequency in MHz) was derived to gauge the likelihood of subharmonic emissions due to stable cavitation activity nucleated from UCAs.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 144
页数:18
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] On the relationship between encapsulated ultrasound contrast agent and pressure
    Adam, D
    Sapunar, M
    Burla, E
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 31 (05) : 673 - 686
  • [2] Akulichev V A, 1971, HIGH INTENSITY ULTRA, P239
  • [3] American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2000, J ULTRAS MED, V19, P97
  • [4] American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM)/National Electri-cal Manufacturers Association (NEMA), 2004, STAND REAL TIM DISPL
  • [5] AMMI AY, 2006, THESIS U PARIS 6
  • [6] CHARACTERIZATION OF ULTRASOUND PROPAGATION THROUGH EX VIVO HUMAN TEMPORAL BONE
    Ammi, Azzdine Y.
    Mast, T. Douglas
    Huang, I-Hua
    Abruzzo, Todd A.
    Coussios, Constantin-C.
    Shaw, George J.
    Holland, Christy K.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 34 (10) : 1578 - 1589
  • [7] Impact of acoustic pressure on ambient pressure estimation using ultrasound contrast agent
    Andersen, Klaus Scheldrup
    Jensen, Jorgen Arendt
    [J]. ULTRASONICS, 2010, 50 (02) : 294 - 299
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1980, CAVITATION INHOMOGEN
  • [9] GAUGING THE LIKELIHOOD OF CAVITATION FROM SHORT-PULSE, LOW-DUTY CYCLE DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND
    APFEL, RE
    HOLLAND, CK
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1991, 17 (02) : 179 - 185
  • [10] WFUMB safety symposium on echo-contrast agents: Nature and types of ultrasound contrast agents
    Bouakaz, Ayache
    de Jong, Nico
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 33 (02) : 187 - 196