On the fundamentals of engineering design science: The geography of engineering design science. Part 2

被引:11
|
作者
Eekels, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, NL-2600 AA Delft, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1080/09544820110055583
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
From the abstract of the whole treatise preceeding Part 1 of this paper (J. Eng. Des.. 2000, vol. 11. no. 4, 377-397) we recall that a stratification for the context of engineering design science was constructed, consisting of 5 levels, viz. general epistemology, engineering design epistemology, engineering design science, engineering design methodics and engineering design practice. The levels of general epistemology and of engineering design epistemology were briefly discussed, and a start was made in discussing the level of engineering design science proper. which would subsequently address I: The action subject of engineering design, II: The action object of engineering design, III: The action process of engineering design, and IV: Engineering design ontology. Part 1 ended with the discussion of 'The action subject of engineering design', so consequently Part 2 starts with discussing 'The action object of engineering design'. The next item, 'The engineering design process' is discussed from two aspects, viz. 'Engineering design phenomenology' and 'Engineering design methodology'. This item, 'The engineering design process' clearly forms the kernel of the paper. After two short paragraphs on 'Engineering design ontology' (belonging to engineering design science) and 'Engineering design methodics' (the tool kit of the engineering designer, but as such not belonging to engineering design science), the paper ends with a logical analysis of the relation between engineering design science and natural science, for which the metaphor of a Siamese Twin clearly presents itself.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 281
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Integrating engineering science and design: A definition and discussion
    Linder, B
    Flowers, WC
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2001, 17 (4-5) : 436 - 439
  • [32] Creativity in design-Science to engineering model
    Rao, J. S.
    MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY, 2018, 125 : 52 - 79
  • [33] Effects of Engineering Design Process on Science and Mathematics
    Fidai, Aamir
    Barroso, Luciana R.
    Capraro, Mary M.
    Capraro, Robert M.
    2020 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE 2020), 2020,
  • [34] Design theory: a foundation of a new paradigm for design science and engineering
    Hatchuel, Armand
    Le Masson, Pascal
    Reich, Yoram
    Subrahmanian, Eswaran
    RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2018, 29 (01) : 5 - 21
  • [35] DESIGN EDUCATION IN COMPUTER-SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
    BOOTH, T
    BRUBAKER, T
    CAIN, T
    DANIELSON, R
    HOELZEMAN, R
    LANGDON, G
    SOLDAN, D
    VARANASI, M
    COMPUTER, 1986, 19 (06) : 20 - &
  • [36] SCIENCE AND DESIGN IN ENGINEERING - DISCUSSION .4.
    DURKEE, J
    LAYTON, E
    FERGUSON, E
    MARTIN, A
    HOUNSHELL, D
    HEWLETT, R
    HARTMAN, JP
    LASKOWITZ, IB
    ISRAEL, P
    ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1984, 424 (MAY) : 203 - 210
  • [37] TEACHABLE FUNDAMENTALS OF ENGINEERING DESIGN
    EDER, WE
    PROCEEDINGS : 1989 FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE, 1989, : 206 - 212
  • [38] Engineering design in the elementary science classroom: supporting student discourse during an engineering design challenge
    McFadden, Justin
    Roehrig, Gillian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2019, 29 (02) : 231 - 262
  • [39] Engineering design in the elementary science classroom: supporting student discourse during an engineering design challenge
    Justin McFadden
    Gillian Roehrig
    International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2019, 29 : 231 - 262
  • [40] Software engineering and computer science. The impending split?
    Gibbs, Norman E., 1600, (07): : 1 - 2