Private competition and market characteristics: evidence from public school efficiency

被引:0
作者
Misra, Kaustav [1 ]
Grimes, Paul W. [2 ]
Rogers, Kevin E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cent Connecticut State Univ, Sch Business, New Britain, CT 06050 USA
[2] Pittsburg State Univ, Kelce Coll Business, Econ, Pittsburg, KS 66762 USA
[3] Mississippi State Univ, Coll Business, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
关键词
Public schools; markets; spatial analysis; efficiency; STUDENT-ACHIEVEMENT; EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES; CHOICE; PERFORMANCE; ENROLLMENT; QUALITY; RACE;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2020.1808175
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The traditional market structure paradigm does not fully identify all components that determine the true degree and complexity of a market's existing competition. Recently, researchers have redefined market structures and market competition using geographic spatial tools We follow this approach in developing a school competition index (SCI) for the state of Mississippi to define the K-12 market and to measure the competition public schools face from private schools. We separate religious private schools from non-religious private schools as an important market characteristic and create two variables to capture the degree of competition each public school faces from peer religious and non-religious private schools spatially located within their local market area. Results from two-stage stochastic frontier analysis indicate that private schools with a religious affiliation significantly increase public schools' performance. The results also suggest that students' race and their socio-economic standard significantly reduce public school efficiency. We conclude that policymakers should consider competition-based school reform policies to increase public school outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 379
页数:16
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Free to Choose: Can School Choice Reduce Student Achievement?
    Abdulkadiroglu, Atila
    Pathak, Parag A.
    Walters, Christopher R.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2018, 10 (01) : 175 - 206
  • [2] Aigner D., 1977, J ECONOMETRICS, V6, P21, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5, 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5]
  • [3] Anderson A., 2006, Improving the perception of public education
  • [4] Do private schools force public schools to compete?
    Arum, R
    [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1996, 61 (01) : 29 - 46
  • [5] Voucher Pathways and Student Achievement in Indiana's Choice Scholarship Program
    Austin, Megan
    Waddington, R. Joseph
    Berends, Mark
    [J]. RSF-THE RUSSELL SAGE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2019, 5 (03): : 20 - 40
  • [6] The effects of competition between schools on educational outcomes: A review for the United States
    Belfield, CR
    Levin, HM
    [J]. REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 72 (02) : 279 - 341
  • [7] Borland M.V., 1992, ECON EDUC REV, V11, P31, DOI [10.1016/0272-7757(92)90019-Y, DOI 10.1016/0272-7757(92)90019-Y]
  • [8] Braddock J.H., 2004, Handbook of research on multicultural education, V2nd, P828
  • [9] Carnoy M., 2000, Educational Researcher, V29, P15, DOI [10.3102/0013189x029007015, DOI 10.3102/0013189X029007015]
  • [10] Chang-Tai H., 2003, NBER WORKING PAPER S