Body mass index and 20 specific cancers: re-analyses of dose-response meta-analyses of observational studies

被引:61
作者
Choi, E. K. [1 ]
Park, H. B. [2 ]
Lee, K. H. [3 ,4 ]
Park, J. H. [5 ]
Eisenhut, M. [6 ]
van der Vliet, H. J. [7 ]
Kim, G. [8 ]
Shin, J. I. [3 ,4 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Nursing, Mo Im Kim Nursing Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ Grad Nursing, Dept Nursing, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Yonsei Ro 50,CPO Box 8044, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Severance Childrens Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Severance Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Luton & Dunstable Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Childrens & Adolescent Serv, Luton, Beds, England
[7] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Keimyung Univ, Dept Nursing, Coll Nursing, Daegu, South Korea
[9] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Inst Kidney Dis Res, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
meta-analysis; umbrella review; cancer; body mass index; RISK; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdx819
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives were to provide an overview and understand the strength of evidence and extent of potential biases and validity of claimed associations between body mass index (BMI) and risk of developing cancer. We carried out an umbrella review and comprehensively re-analyzed the data of dose-response meta-analyses on associations between BMI and risk of 20 specific cancers (bladder, brain, breast, colonic, rectal, endometrial, gallbladder, gastric, leukemia, liver, lung, melanoma, multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, esophagus, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, renal, thyroid) by adding big data or missed individual studies. Convincing evidence for an association was defined as a strong statistical significance in fixed-effects and random-effects meta-analyses at P < 0.001, 95% prediction interval (PI) excluded null, there was no large between-study heterogeneity and no small study effects. Suggestive evidence was defined as meeting the significance threshold for the random summary effects of P < 0.05, but 95% PI included the null. Weak evidence was defined as meeting the significance threshold for the random summary effects at a P < 0.05, but 95% PI included the null and there was large between-study heterogeneity or there were small study effects. Convincing evidence for an association with BMI was detectable for six cancers (leukemia, multiple myeloma, pancreatic, endometrial, rectal, and renal cell carcinoma). Suggestive evidence was detectable for malignant melanoma, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Weak evidence was detectable for brain and central nervous system tumors, breast, colon, gall bladder, lung, liver, ovarian, and thyroid cancer. No evidence was detectable for bladder, gastric, and prostate cancer. The association of increased BMI and cancer is heterogeneous across cancer types. Leukemia, multiple myeloma, pancreatic, endometrial, rectal, and renal cell carcinoma are convincingly associated with an increased BMI by dose-response meta-analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 757
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Environmental risk factors and multiple sclerosis: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses [J].
Belbasis, Lazaros ;
Bellou, Vanesa ;
Evangelou, Evangelos ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. ;
Tzoulaki, Ioanna .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2015, 14 (03) :263-273
[2]   Body-mass index and risk of 22 specific cancers: a population-based cohort study of 5.24 million UK adults [J].
Bhaskaran, Krishnan ;
Douglas, Ian ;
Forbes, Harriet ;
dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel ;
Leon, David A. ;
Smeeth, Liam .
LANCET, 2014, 384 (9945) :755-765
[3]   Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials - How do their results compare? [J].
Cappelleri, JC ;
Ioannidis, JPA ;
Schmid, CH ;
deFerranti, SD ;
Aubert, M ;
Chalmers, TC ;
Lau, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (16) :1332-1338
[4]   Body mass index and risk of lung cancer: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis [J].
Duan, Peng ;
Hu, Chunhui ;
Quan, Chao ;
Yi, Xianfu ;
Zhou, Wei ;
Yuan, Meng ;
Yu, Tingting ;
Kourouma, Ansoumane ;
Yang, Kedi .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
[5]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[6]  
Fitzmaurice C, 2017, JAMA ONCOL, V3, P524, DOI [10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688, 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2706]
[7]   The Global Burden of Cancer 2013 Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration [J].
Fitzmaurice, Christina ;
Dicker, Daniel ;
Pain, Amanda ;
Hamavid, Hannah ;
Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar ;
Maclntyre, Michael F. ;
Allen, Christine ;
Hansen, Gillian ;
Woodbrook, Rachel ;
Wolfe, Charles ;
Hamadeh, Randah R. ;
Moore, Ami ;
Werdecker, Andrea ;
Gessner, Bradford D. ;
Te Ao, Braden ;
McMahon, Brian ;
Karimkhani, Chante ;
Yu, Chuanhua ;
Cooke, Graham S. ;
Schwebel, David C. ;
Carpenter, David O. ;
Pereira, David M. ;
Nash, Denis ;
Kazi, Dhruv S. ;
De Leo, Diego ;
Plass, Dietrich ;
Ukwaja, Kingsley N. ;
Thurston, George D. ;
Jin, Kim Yun ;
Simard, Edgar P. ;
Mills, Edward ;
Park, Eun-Kee ;
Catala-Lopez, Ferran ;
DeVeber, Gabrielle ;
Gotay, Carolyn ;
Khan, Gulfaraz ;
Hosgood, H. Dean, III ;
Santos, Itamar S. ;
Leasher, Janet L. ;
Singh, Jasvinder ;
Leigh, James ;
Jonas, Jost B. ;
Sanabria, Juan ;
Beardsley, Justin ;
Jacobsen, Kathryn H. ;
Takahashi, Ken ;
Franklin, Richard C. ;
Ronfani, Luca ;
Montico, Marcella ;
Naldi, Luigi .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2015, 1 (04) :505-527
[8]   What is heterogeneity and is it important? [J].
Fletcher, John .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7584) :94-96
[9]   Increased educational attainment and its effect on child mortality in 175 countries between 1970 and 2009: a systematic analysis [J].
Gakidou, Emmanuela ;
Cowling, Krycia ;
Lozano, Rafael ;
Murray, Christopher J. L. .
LANCET, 2010, 376 (9745) :959-974
[10]   Robust meta-analytic conclusions mandate the provision of prediction intervals in meta-analysis summaries [J].
Graham, Petra L. ;
Moran, John L. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (05) :503-510