Chronotolerance of experimental radioimmunotherapy:: Clearance, toxicity, and maximal tolerated dose of 131I-anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) IgG as a function of time of day of dosing in a murine model

The temporal variation in bone marrow proliferation has been used to help define the optimal time of day to dose with approximately 30 chemotherapeutic agents, so that treatment efficacy is maximised and toxicity is minimised. Since myelosuppression is also the dose-limiting toxicity for most forms of radioimmunotherapy, we hypothesised that time of day of administration might also influence tolerance for radioantibody therapy. Bone marrow proliferative activity in BALB/c mice was determined using cell cycle analysis of propidium iodide-stained bone marrow samples collected at 3 h intervals. Myelosuppression was determined at weekly intervals after a therapeutic dose of I-131-Np-4 anti-CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) intact IgG at either 0900 h (2 h after light onset [HALO]), 1300 h (6 HALO) or 1600 h (9 HALO). The highest bone marrow proliferative activity was noted between 20 HALO (0300 h) and 4 HALO (1100 h), and the lowest activity could be measured at 10-13 HALO (1700-2000 h). Seven days after a maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of radioantibody, granulocyte reduction was 50% at both 2 and 6 HALO and only 32% at 9 HALO (P < 0.003). Fourteen days after radioantibody therapy, an 87% granulocyte suppression was observed in mice treated at 2 HALO and only a 64% granulocyte loss was noted in the 9 HALO treated group (P < 0.001). The 2 HALO group recovered earlier than the 9 HALO group (P < 0.013; 22% loss from the 2 HALO dose and 40% loss from the 9 HALO dose) on day 28 post-radioimmunotherapy. The difference in magnitude of neutropenia, rather than duration, was critical for establishing the MTD. A 30% increase in the MTD was possible if mice were dosed at 9 HALO (320 mu Ci) versus 2 HALO (240 mu Ci). These studies suggest that principles of chronobiology may govern the magnitude of toxicity and the highest dose tolerated in radioantibody therapy in the same way that it does for cytotoxic drug therapy. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.