Reconceptualizing public participation in environmental assessment as EA civics

被引:47
作者
Sinclair, A. John [1 ]
Diduck, Alan P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Nat Resources Inst, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[2] Univ Winnipeg, Dept Environm Studies & Sci, 515 Portage Ave, Winnipeg, MB R3B 2E9, Canada
关键词
Environmental assessment; Public participation; Civics; EA civics; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION; NATURAL-RESOURCE; SUSTAINABILITY; INVOLVEMENT; MANAGEMENT; EDUCATION; OUTCOMES; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2016.03.009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Notwithstanding the considerable attention placed on creating meaningful opportunities for public participation in environmental assessment (EA), many participants and those who have reviewed participation processes often find practice sorely wanting. This reality stands in stark juxtaposition to future environmental governance needs, which will require increased openness, deliberation and transdisciplinary knowledge in order to deal with environmental change that is ever more uncertain, complex and conflictual. In this paper, our purpose was to consider how to meet those needs through reconceptualizing public participation as EA civics, founded on an active citizen base, deliberative in nature and orientated toward learning. We do this through developing a new conceptual model of next generation participation processes that is relevant at multiple spatial scales and institutional levels, is applicable to the entire assessment cycle and spans temporal scales through feedback loops. Our EA civics model builds on the "civics approach" to environmental governance and "action civics" by extending their core ideas to participation in EA. We did this by conducting an integrative literature review (including numerous papers we have contributed over the years) and reflecting on our own experiences as EA participants. We apply current thinking on public participation design to our EA civics conceptualization and highlight important design features that have received scant attention. We conclude that EA civics holds promise for fairer and more robust participation processes if all aspects of the model are considered and the actions related to each are implemented. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 182
页数:9
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   What Do We Mean By "Civic Engagement"? [J].
Adler, Richard P. ;
Goggin, Judy .
JOURNAL OF TRANSFORMATIVE EDUCATION, 2005, 3 (03) :236-253
[2]  
Andrew J., 2001, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V21, P23, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00074-3
[3]  
Armitage D, 2010, SPRINGER SER ENV MAN, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-12194-4
[4]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[5]  
Beierle T.C., 1999, Policy Studies Review, V16, P75, DOI [DOI 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00879.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1541-1338.1999.TB00879.X]
[6]  
Beierle T.C. Cayford., 2002, Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions
[7]  
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, 2016, PUBL PART GUID
[8]  
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, 2010, POL AND GUID
[9]  
Canadian Environmental Network (CEN), 1988, FED ENV ASS PROC COR
[10]  
Castro Camila Moreira de, 2013, Rev. Adm. Pública, V47, P1069