A Confirmatory Approach to Examining the Factor Structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): A Large Scale Cohort Study

被引:86
作者
Niclasen, Janni [1 ]
Skovgaard, Anne Mette [2 ]
Andersen, Anne-Marie Nybo [3 ]
Somhovd, Mikael Julius [1 ]
Obel, Carsten [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Psychol, DK-1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Child & Adolescent Psychiat Ctr Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Publ Hlth, DK-1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark
[4] Univ Aarhus, Dept Publ Hlth, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
关键词
Strengths and difficulties questionnaire; SDQ; Psychometric properties; Factor structure; Confirmatory factor analysis; CFA; CR reliability; AVE reliability; Psychopathology; Mental health; Children; Adolescents; Cohort; Questionnaire; CHILD;
D O I
10.1007/s10802-012-9683-y
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to examine the factor structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) using a Structural Confirmatory Factor Analytic approach. The Danish translation of the SDQ was distributed to 71,840 parents and teachers of 5-7 and 10-12-year-old boys and girls from four large scale cohorts. Three theoretical models were examined: 1. a model with five first order factors (i.e., hyperactivity/inattention, conduct, emotional, peer problems and prosocial), 2. a model adding two internalising and externalising second order factors to model 1, and 3. a model adding a total difficulties second order factor to model 1. Model fits were evaluated, multi-group analyses were carried out and average variance extracted (AVE) and composite reliability (CR) estimates were examined. In this general population sample, low risk sample models 1 and 2 showed similar good overall fits. Best model fits were found when two positively worded items were allowed to cross load with the prosocial scale, and cross loadings were allowed for among three sets of indicators. The analyses also revealed that model fits were slightly better for teachers than for parents and better for older children than for younger children. No convincing differences were found between boys and girls. Factor loadings were acceptable for all groups, especially for older children rated by teachers. Some emotional, peer, conduct and prosocial subscale problems were revealed for younger children rated by parents. The analyses revealed more internal consistency for older children rated by teachers than for younger children rated by parents. It is recommended that model 1 comprising five first order factors, or alternatively model 2 with additionally two internalising/externalising second order factors, should be used when employing the SDQ in low risk epidemiological samples.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 365
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Brown T.A., 2015, Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, V2nd
[2]  
Byrne B, 2010, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF PSYCHOLOGY IN EDUCATION, P3
[3]  
Christensen E., 2004, 0413 SOC
[4]   Revisiting the factor structure of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: United States, 2001 [J].
Dickey, WC ;
Blumberg, SJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 43 (09) :1159-1167
[5]   The prevalence of SDQ-measured mental health problems at age 5-7 years and identification of predictors from birth to preschool age in a Danish birth cohort: The Copenhagen Child Cohort 2000 [J].
Elberling, Hanne ;
Linneberg, Allan ;
Olsen, Else Marie ;
Goodman, Robert ;
Skovgaard, Anne Mette .
EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 19 (09) :725-735
[6]   EVALUATING STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS WITH UNOBSERVABLE VARIABLES AND MEASUREMENT ERROR [J].
FORNELL, C ;
LARCKER, DF .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1981, 18 (01) :39-50
[7]   When to Use Broader Internalising and Externalising Subscales Instead of the Hypothesised Five Subscales on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Data from British Parents, Teachers and Children [J].
Goodman, Anna ;
Lamping, Donna L. ;
Ploubidis, George B. .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 38 (08) :1179-1191
[8]   The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note [J].
Goodman, R .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY AND ALLIED DISCIPLINES, 1997, 38 (05) :581-586
[9]   Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire [J].
Goodman, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 40 (11) :1337-1345
[10]   Comparing the strengths and difficulties questionnaire and the child behavior checklist: Is small beautiful? [J].
Goodman, R ;
Scott, S .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 27 (01) :17-24