Operationalizing the definition of e-leadership: identifying the elements of e-leadership

被引:125
作者
Van Wart, Montgomery [1 ,2 ]
Roman, Alexandru [2 ]
Wang, XiaoHu [3 ]
Liu, Cheol [4 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ San Bernardino, 5500 Univ Pkwy, San Bernardino, CA 92506 USA
[2] Calif State Univ San Bernardino, Coll Business & Publ Adm, San Bernardino, CA 92506 USA
[3] City Univ, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] KDI Sch Publ Policy & Management, Sejong, South Korea
关键词
administrative leadership; e-skills; ICTs and government; leadership; public sector leadership; E-GOVERNMENT; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1177/0020852316681446
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The effects of the ongoing digital revolution have been profound and have been studied in many contexts such as government interaction with the public (e-participation) and administrative structures (e-administration). However, the study of how the digital revolution has changed leaders' interactions with followers via information and communication technologies (ICTs) has been modest, and the theory building in organizational studies and public administration has been, for the most part, nonexistent. A major reason for this lack of progress is the inability to produce an operational definition of e-leadership that spans telework, team, and enterprise settings. The article examines an exploratory case study to propose an operational definition based on six factors (or broad e-competencies) for e-leadership. Research limitations and future research opportunities are discussed. Points for practitioners E-leadership, technology-mediated leadership, has become critically important for leaders at all levels, both inside and outside of the organization. E-leadership is as much about blending technologies and traditional communication as it is about simply using more ICT-mediated communication. While there is a lot of consistency in the types of leadership skills needed in traditional and virtual environments, they are not the same and the differences are critical to success and failure. The areas in which competence in e-skills were most important included: e-communication, e-social skills, e-team building, e-change management, e-technology skills, and e-trustworthiness.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 97
页数:18
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Allen E., 2015, GRADE LEVEL TRACKING
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, US POSTSECONDARY FAC
[3]   Applying participatory design and collaboration in digital public services for discovering and re-designing e-Government services [J].
Anthopoulos, Leo G. ;
Siozos, Panagiotis ;
Tsoukalas, Ioannis A. .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2007, 24 (02) :353-376
[4]   Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website [J].
Anthopoulos, Leonidas ;
Reddick, Christopher G. ;
Giannakidou, Irene ;
Mavridis, Nikolaos .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2016, 33 (01) :161-173
[5]   E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice [J].
Avolio, BJ ;
Kahai, S ;
Dodge, GE .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2000, 11 (04) :615-668
[6]   E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission [J].
Avolio, Bruce J. ;
Sosik, John J. ;
Kahai, Surinder S. ;
Baker, Bradford .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2014, 25 (01) :105-131
[7]  
Bakar Nur Azaliah A., 2016, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, V88, P176
[8]   Predictors of the emergence of transformational leadership in virtual decision teams [J].
Balthazard, Pierre A. ;
Waldman, David A. ;
Warren, John E. .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2009, 20 (05) :651-663
[9]   Trust and transformational government: A proposed framework for research [J].
Bannister, Frank ;
Connolly, Regina .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2011, 28 (02) :137-147
[10]  
Brake T., 2006, IND COMMERCIAL TRAIN, V38, P116, DOI DOI 10.1108/00197850610659364