Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance and bioreactance methods at rest and during exercise

被引:29
作者
Jakovljevic, Djordje G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Moore, Sarah [2 ,4 ]
Hallsworth, Kate [2 ,4 ]
Fattakhova, Gulnar [2 ]
Thoma, Christian [2 ,4 ]
Trenell, Michael I. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Med, MoveLab, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4HH, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, MRC Ctr Brain Ageing & Vital, MoveLab Phys Activ & Exercise Res, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4HH, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Newcastle Univ, Sch Med, Inst Ageing & Hlth, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4HH, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Newcastle Univ, Inst Cellular Med, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4HH, Tyne & Wear, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Cardiac output; Exercise testing; Bioimpedance; Bioreactance; PULMONARY-ARTERY CATHETERS; MAXIMAL AEROBIC EXERCISE; IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; HEART-FAILURE; STROKE VOLUME; RELIABILITY; PRESSURE; VALIDITY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s10877-012-9334-4
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Bioreactance is a novel non-invasive method for cardiac output measurement that involves the analysis of blood flow-dependent changes in the phase shifts of electrical currents applied across the chest. The present study (1) compared resting and exercise cardiac outputs determined by bioreactance and bioimpedance methods and those estimated from measured oxygen consumption, (2) determined the relationship between cardiac output and oxygen consumption, and (3) assessed the agreement between the bioreactance and bioimpedance methods. Twelve healthy subjects (aged 30 +/- A 4 years) performed graded cardiopulmonary exercise test on a recumbent cycle ergometer on two occasions, 1 week apart. Cardiac output was monitored at rest, at 30, 50, 70, 90, 150 W and at peak exercise intensity by bioreactance and bioimpedance and expired gases collected. Resting cardiac output was not significantly different between the bioreactance and bioimpedance methods (6.2 +/- A 1.4 vs. 6.5 +/- A 1.4 l min(-1), P = 0.42). During exercise cardiac outputs were correlated with oxygen uptake for both bioreactance (r = 0.84, P < 0.01) and bioimpedance techniques (r = 0.82, P < 0.01). At peak exercise bioimpedance estimated significantly lower cardiac outputs than both bioreactance and theoretically calculated cardiac output (14.3 +/- A 2.6 vs. 17.5 +/- A 5.2 vs. 16.9 +/- A 4.9 l min(-1), P < 0.05). Bland-Altman analyses including data from rest and exercise demonstrated that the bioimpedance method reported similar to 1.5 l min(-1) lower cardiac output than bioreactance with lower and upper limits of agreement of -2.98 to 5.98 l min(-1). Bioimpedance and bioreactance methods provide different cardiac output estimates, particularly at high exercise intensity, and therefore the two methods cannot be used interchangeably. In contrast with bioimpedance, bioreactance cardiac outputs are similar to those estimated from measured oxygen consumption.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 68
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance and bioreactance methods at rest and during exercise
    Djordje G. Jakovljevic
    Sarah Moore
    Kate Hallsworth
    Gulnar Fattakhova
    Christian Thoma
    Michael I. Trenell
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2012, 26 : 63 - 68
  • [2] Bioimpedance and bioreactance methods for monitoring cardiac output
    Jakovljevic, Djordje G.
    Trenell, Michael I.
    MacGowan, Guy A.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2014, 28 (04) : 381 - 394
  • [3] Bioreactance is a reliable method for estimating cardiac output at rest and during exercise
    Jones, T. W.
    Houghton, D.
    Cassidy, S.
    MacGowan, G. A.
    Trenell, M. I.
    Jakovljevic, D. G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 115 (03) : 386 - 391
  • [4] Application of bioreactance for cardiac output assessment during exercise in healthy individuals
    Elliott, Adrian
    Hull, James H.
    Nunan, David
    Jakovljevic, Djordje G.
    Brodie, David
    Ansley, Lesley
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 109 (05) : 945 - 951
  • [5] Cardiac output during exercise: A comparison of four methods
    Siebenmann, C.
    Rasmussen, P.
    Sorensen, H.
    Zaar, M.
    Hvidtfeldt, M.
    Pichon, A.
    Secher, N. H.
    Lundby, C.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2015, 25 (01) : E20 - E27
  • [6] Comparison of cardiac output estimates by bioreactance and inert gas rebreathing methods during cardiopulmonary exercise testing
    Okwose, Nduka C.
    Chowdhury, Shakir
    Houghton, David
    Trenell, Michael I.
    Eggett, Christopher
    Bates, Matthew
    MacGowan, Guy A.
    Jakovljevic, Djordje G.
    CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, 2018, 38 (03) : 483 - 490
  • [7] Comparison of cardiac output determined by different rebreathing methods at rest and at peak exercise
    Jakovljevic, Djordje G.
    Nunan, David
    Donovan, Gay
    Hodges, Lynette D.
    Sandercock, Gavin R. H.
    Brodie, David A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 102 (05) : 593 - 599
  • [8] Comparison of cardiac output determined by different rebreathing methods at rest and at peak exercise
    Djordje G. Jakovljevic
    David Nunan
    Gay Donovan
    Lynette D. Hodges
    Gavin R. H. Sandercock
    David A. Brodie
    European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2008, 102 : 593 - 599
  • [9] A Multicenter Study of Noninvasive Cardiac Output by Bioreactance During Symptom-limited Exercise
    Maurer, Mathew M.
    Burkhoff, Daniel
    Maybaum, Simon
    Franco, Veronica
    Vittorio, Timothy J.
    Williams, Paula
    White, Leah
    Kamalakkannan, Gayathri
    Myers, Jonathan
    Mancini, Donna M.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2009, 15 (08) : 689 - 699
  • [10] Comparison of bioreactance non-invasive cardiac output measurements with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
    Trinkmann, F.
    Schneider, C.
    Michels, J. D.
    Stach, K.
    Doesch, C.
    Schoenberg, S. O.
    Borggrefe, M.
    Saur, J.
    Papavassiliu, T.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2016, 44 (06) : 769 - 776