Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla

被引:119
作者
Roethke, M. C. [1 ]
Kuru, T. H. [2 ]
Schultze, S. [1 ]
Tichy, D. [3 ]
Kopp-Schneider, A. [3 ]
Fenchel, M. [1 ]
Schlemmer, H. -P. [1 ]
Hadaschik, B. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] German Canc Res Ctr, Dept Radiol E010, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Heidelberg Hosp, Dept Urol, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] German Canc Res Ctr, Div Biostat, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
ESUR score; MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy; Multiparametric MRI; PI-RADS; Prostate cancer; LOCAL STAGING ACCURACY; ENDORECTAL COIL; CANCER-DETECTION; LOCALIZATION; PERFORMANCE; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-013-3017-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To evaluate the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) proposed by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) for detection of prostate cancer (PCa) by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in a consecutive cohort of patients with magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound (MR/TRUS) fusion-guided biopsy. Suspicious lesions on mpMRI at 3.0 T were scored according to the PI-RADS system before MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy and correlated to histopathology results. Statistical correlation was obtained by a Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and optimal thresholds were calculated. In 64 patients, 128/445 positive biopsy cores were obtained out of 95 suspicious regions of interest (ROIs). PCa was present in 27/64 (42 %) of the patients. ROC results for the aggregated PI-RADS scores exhibited higher areas under the curve compared to those of the Likert score. Sensitivity/specificity for the following thresholds were calculated: 73 %/92 % and 85 %/67 % for PI-RADS scores of 9 and 10, respectively; 85 %/56 % and 60 %/97 % for Likert scores of 3 and 4, respectively. The standardised ESUR PI-RADS system is beneficial to indicate the likelihood of PCa of suspicious lesions on mpMRI. It is also valuable to identify locations to be targeted with biopsy. The aggregated PI-RADS score achieved better results compared to the single five-point Likert score. aEuro cent The ESUR PI-RADS scoring system was evaluated using multiparametric 3.0-T MRI. aEuro cent To investigate suspicious findings, transperineal MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy was used. aEuro cent PI-RADS can guide biopsy locations and improve detection of clinically significant cancer. aEuro cent Biopsy procedures can be optimised, reducing unnecessary negative biopsies for patients. aEuro cent The PI-RADS scoring system may contribute to more effective prostate MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 352
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]   Prostate Cancer: Multiparametric MR Imaging for Detection, Localization, and Staging [J].
Hoeks, Caroline M. A. ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Yakar, Derya ;
Somford, Diederik M. ;
Heijmink, Stijn W. T. P. J. ;
Scheenen, Tom W. J. ;
Vos, Pieter C. ;
Huisman, Henkjan ;
van Oort, Inge M. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Heerschap, Arend ;
Fuetterer, Jurgen J. .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 261 (01) :46-66
[12]   Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Image Targeted Prostate Biopsy Versus Transperineal Template Prostate Biopsy in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer [J].
Kasivisvanathan, Veeru ;
Dufour, Robert ;
Moore, Caroline M. ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Abd-Alazeez, Mohamed ;
Charman, Susan C. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Allen, Clare ;
Kirkham, Alex ;
van der Meulen, Jan ;
Emberton, Mark .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (03) :860-866
[13]   How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate? [J].
Kirkham, Alexander P. S. ;
Emberton, Mark ;
Allen, Clare .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 50 (06) :1163-1175
[14]   Active Surveillance for Favorable-risk Prostate Cancer: Background, Patient Selection, Triggers for Intervention, and Outcomes [J].
Klotz, Laurence .
CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 13 (02) :153-159
[15]   Phantom Study of a Novel Stereotactic Prostate Biopsy System Integrating Preinterventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Live Ultrasonography Fusion [J].
Kuru, Timur H. ;
Roethke, Matthias ;
Popeneciu, Valentin ;
Teber, Dogu ;
Pahernik, Sascha ;
Zogal, Pawel ;
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter ;
Hadaschik, Boris A. ;
Hohenfellner, Markus .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (07) :807-813
[16]   Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging [J].
Lee, Seung Hwan ;
Park, Kyung Kgi ;
Choi, Kyung Hwa ;
Lim, Beom Jin ;
Kim, Joo Hee ;
Lee, Seung Wook ;
Chung, Byung Ha .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 28 (06) :667-672
[17]   The BI-RADS Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lexicon [J].
Molleran, Virginia ;
Mahoney, Mary C. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 18 (02) :171-+
[18]   Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer [J].
Park, Byung Kwan ;
Kim, Bohyun ;
Kim, Chan Kyo ;
Lee, Hyun Moo ;
Kwon, Ghee Young .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2007, 31 (04) :534-538
[19]   Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy Improves Cancer Detection Following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy and Correlates With Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging [J].
Pinto, Peter A. ;
Chung, Paul H. ;
Rastinehad, Ardeshir R. ;
Baccala, Angelo A., Jr. ;
Kruecker, Jochen ;
Benjamin, Compton J. ;
Xu, Sheng ;
Yan, Pingkun ;
Kadoury, Samuel ;
Chua, Celene ;
Locklin, Julia K. ;
Turkbey, Baris ;
Shih, Joanna H. ;
Gates, Stacey P. ;
Buckner, Carey ;
Bratslavsky, Gennady ;
Linehan, W. Marston ;
Glossop, Neil D. ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Wood, Bradford J. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (04) :1281-1285
[20]   Prospective comparison of T2w-MRI and dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI, 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging or diffusion-weighted MRI in repeat TRUS-guided biopsies [J].
Portalez, Daniel ;
Rollin, Gautier ;
Leandri, Pierre ;
Elman, Benjamin ;
Mouly, Patrick ;
Jonca, Frederic ;
Malavaud, Bernard .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (12) :2781-2790