Review of the uncertainty analysis of groundwater numerical simulation

被引:92
作者
Wu JiChun [1 ]
Zeng XianKui [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Earth Sci & Engn, Key Lab Surficial Geochem,Minist Educ,Dept Hydros, State Key Lab Pollut Control & Resource Reuse, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN | 2013年 / 58卷 / 25期
关键词
groundwater modeling; uncertainty analysis; model parameter; conceptual model; observation data; MONTE-CARLO; CONCEPTUAL-MODEL; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; INPUT UNCERTAINTY; BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS; COMPUTER CODE; GLUE; INCOHERENCE; INFERENCE; FLOW;
D O I
10.1007/s11434-013-5950-8
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Groundwater system is a complex and open system, which is affected by natural conditions and human activities. Natural hydrological processes is conceptualized through relatively simple flow governing equations in groundwater models. Moreover, observation data is always limited in field hydrogeological conditions. Therefore, the predictive results of groundwater simulation often deviate from true values, which is attribute to the uncertainty of groundwater numerical simulation. According to the process of system simulation, the uncertainty sources of groundwater numerical simulation can be divided into model parameters, conceptual model and observation data uncertainties. In addition, the uncertainty stemmed from boundary conditions is sometimes refered as scenario uncertainty. In this paper, the origination and category of groundwater modeling uncertainty are analyzed. The recent progresses on the methods of groundwater modeling uncertainty analysis are reivewed. Furthermore, the researches on the comprehensive analysis of uncertainty sources, and the predictive uncertainty of model outputs are discussed. Finally, several prospects on the deveolpment of groundwater modeling uncetainty analysis are proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:3044 / 3052
页数:9
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction [J].
Ajami, Newsha K. ;
Duan, Qingyun ;
Sorooshian, Soroosh .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2007, 43 (01)
[2]   Sustainable water resource management under hydrological uncertainty [J].
Ajami, Newsha K. ;
Hornberger, George M. ;
Sunding, David L. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2008, 44 (11)
[3]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[4]  
[Anonymous], HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, DOI DOI 10.5194/HESSD-8-4025-2011
[5]   Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data [J].
Aronica, G ;
Hankin, B ;
Beven, K .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 1998, 22 (04) :349-365
[6]   A Markov chain Monte Carlo scheme for parameter estimation and inference in conceptual rainfall-runoff modeling [J].
Bates, BC ;
Campbell, EP .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2001, 37 (04) :937-947
[7]   Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology [J].
Beven, K ;
Freer, J .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2001, 249 (1-4) :11-29
[8]   Comment on "Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: incoherence of the GLUE methodology" by Pietro Mantovan and Ezio Todini [J].
Beven, Keith ;
Smith, Paul ;
Freer, Jim .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2007, 338 (3-4) :315-318
[9]   So just why would a modeller choose to be incoherent? [J].
Beven, Keith J. ;
Smith, Paul J. ;
Freer, Jim E. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2008, 354 (1-4) :15-32
[10]   Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) using adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling [J].
Blasone, Roberta-Serena ;
Vrugt, Jasper A. ;
Madsen, Henrik ;
Rosbjerg, Dan ;
Robinson, Bruce A. ;
Zyvoloski, George A. .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2008, 31 (04) :630-648