Value-independent Third-party Orchestrators as Catalysts of Business Collaboration

被引:6
作者
Pinnington, Bruce [1 ]
Lyons, Andrew [1 ]
Meehan, Joanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Sch Management, Chatham St, Liverpool L69 7ZH, Merseyside, England
关键词
Grounded theory; organization theory; public management; business & government; INNOVATION; INDUSTRY; NETWORK; ORGANIZATION; MANAGEMENT; INTERMEDIARIES; THINKING; VOICE;
D O I
10.1177/1056492620959455
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Collaboration is recognized by policy-makers as a key element in innovation-led economic growth. Collaborative relationships form organically, but also can be actively facilitated. Studies of business collaboration facilitation typically concentrate on value-appropriating commercial organizations, acting as hub orchestrators or knowledge-brokers. Little attention has been paid to potentially more trustable and effective value-independent facilitators. The attributes and activities of these organizations were empirically investigated using grounded theory and situational analysis. Value-independent, third-party orchestrators (i3POs) are demarcated from related concepts, and are found to vary considerably in capability and motivation as collaboration orchestrators. A reappraisal of these organizations' drivers, from the perspective of collective action theory, suggests how more i3POs may be encouraged to follow the practices of leading examples, with positive economic outcomes. Membership-based i3POs, such as trade associations, have longer term potential as collaboration orchestrators than transient business-growth programs but are under-exploited in this regard.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 453
页数:16
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Network management in the era of ecosystems: Systematic review and management framework [J].
Aarikka-Stenroos, Leena ;
Ritala, Paavo .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2017, 67 :23-36
[2]   Building an Institutional Field to Corral a Government: A Case to Set an Agenda for Organization Studies [J].
Barley, Stephen R. .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2010, 31 (06) :777-805
[3]   One Voice, But Whose Voice? Exploring What Drives Trade Association Activity [J].
Barnett, Michael L. .
BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2013, 52 (02) :213-244
[4]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[5]   The antecedents of new R&D collaborations with different partner types: On the dynamics of past R&D collaboration and innovative performance [J].
Belderbos, Rene ;
Gilsing, Victor ;
Lokshin, Boris ;
Carree, Martin ;
Sastre, Juan Fernandez .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2018, 51 (02) :285-302
[6]  
Birks M., 2015, GROUNDED THEORY PRAC, V2nd
[7]   Thinking Informatically [J].
Bryant, Antony .
INFORMATICS-BASEL, 2014, 1 (01) :1-10
[8]   The moderating role of information technology capability in the relationship between supply chain collaboration and organizational responsiveness Evidence from China [J].
Cai, Zhao ;
Huang, Qian ;
Liu, Hefu ;
Liang, Liang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2016, 36 (10) :1247-1271
[9]   Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance [J].
Cao, Mei ;
Zhang, Qingyu .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (03) :163-180
[10]  
Charmaz K., 2014, Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis, DOI 10.7748/nr.13.4.84.s4