Radiation dose in CT colonography-trends in time and differences between daily practice and screening protocols

被引:47
作者
Liedenbaum, M. H. [1 ]
Venema, H. W. [1 ]
Stoker, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
CT colonography; radiation dose; colorectal neoplasms; computed tomography;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-008-0994-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the currently used effective doses in CT colonography (CTC) and to search for trends in time. A Pubmed search for articles and a search for congress abstracts concerning CTC was performed. Research institutions were sent a CTC dose questionnaire concerning the type of CT system employed and the CT parameters used. With the ImPACT CT Dosimetry Spreadsheet effective doses were calculated. Of 83 institutions, 34 returned a complete questionnaire; 21 (62%) used 64-detector row CT and 17 (50%) used dose modulation. The median effective dose per institution was 5.7 mSv (2.8 mSv supine; 2.5 mSv prone) for screening protocols and 9.1 mSv (5.2 and 3.0 mSv, respectively) for daily practice protocols (p < 0.05). Doses did not differ significantly between CT machines with different numbers of detector rows. In 17 institutions incorporated in a study in 2004 as well, the median dose for daily practice protocols changed from 11 mSv in 2004 to 9.7 mSv now (n.s.). Median effective dose for CTC is significantly lower for screening than for daily practice protocols. Although the number of CTC protocols with dose modulation increased substantially since 2004, no significant decrease in effective dose was found.
引用
收藏
页码:2222 / 2230
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Bongartz G., 2004, European guidelines for multislice computed tomography
[2]   Mass screening with CT colonography: Should the radiation exposure be of concern? [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Georgsson, MA .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 129 (01) :328-337
[3]   Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey [J].
Brix, G ;
Nagel, HD ;
Stamm, G ;
Veit, R ;
Lechel, U ;
Griebel, J ;
Galanski, M .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (08) :1979-1991
[4]   Feasibility of MDCT colonography in ultra-low-dose technique in the detection of colorectal lesions: Comparison with high-resolution video colonoscopy [J].
Cohnen, M ;
Vogt, C ;
Beck, A ;
Andersen, K ;
Heinen, W ;
vom Dahl, S ;
Aurich, V ;
Haeussinger, D ;
Moedder, U .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 183 (05) :1355-1359
[5]   Dose reduction and image quality in MDCT colonography using tube current modulation [J].
Graser, A. ;
Wintersperger, B. J. ;
Suess, C. ;
Reiser, M. F. ;
Becker, C. R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (03) :695-701
[6]   Dose reduction in CT examination of children by an attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current (CARE Dose) [J].
Greess, H ;
Nömayr, A ;
Wolf, H ;
Baum, U ;
Lell, M ;
Böwing, B ;
Kalender, W ;
Bautz, WA .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (06) :1571-1576
[7]  
Heiken Jay P, 2005, Cancer Imaging, V5 Spec No A, pS133, DOI 10.1102/1470-7330.2005.0108
[8]   Effective radiation doses in CT colonography:: results of an inventory among research institutions [J].
Jensch, S ;
van Gelder, RE ;
Venema, HW ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bossuyt, PMM ;
Laméris, JS ;
Stoker, J .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (05) :981-987
[9]   CT colonography: determination of optimal CT technique using a novel colon phantom [J].
Johnson, KT ;
Johnson, CD ;
Anderson, SM ;
Bruesewitz, MR ;
McCollough, CH .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2004, 29 (02) :173-176
[10]  
KALENDER W, 2005, COMPUT TOMOGR, P179