Role of skin biopsy to confirm suspected acute graft-vs-host disease - Results of decision analysis

被引:37
作者
Firoz, BF
Lee, SJ
Nghiem, P
Qureshi, AA
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] NYU, Dept Dermatol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archderm.142.2.175
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Objective: To estimate the value of skin biopsy in the evaluation of suspected acute cutaneous graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Design: Decision analysis using parameters specified by expert opinion for skin biopsy characteristics, prevalence of acute GVHD, and value of potential outcomes. One-, 2-, and 3-way sensitivity analyses were performed. Setting: Major stem cell transplantation centers in the United States. Patients: Hypothetical cohort of patients with suspected acute cutaneous GVHD after stem cell transplantation. Interventions: The following 3 interventions were compared: treat immediately for GVHD without performing a skin biopsy, perform a skin biopsy and treat immediately but stop treatment if skin biopsy specimen findings are inconsistent with GVHD, and perform a skin biopsy and await results of the skin biopsy specimen before treating. Main Outcome Measures: Number of patients appropriately and inappropriately treated with each intervention, consistency of physician-reported behavior, individualized decision analyses, and preferred intervention based on the aggregate estimates of respondents. Results: The decision to treat immediately for GVHD without performing a skin biopsy yielded the best clinical outcome for the specified clinical setting and under the parameters specified by expert opinion. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that these conclusions are robust if the prevalence of acute cutaneous GVHD in stem cell recipients with rash is greater than 50%, if the sensitivity of skin biopsy specimen is less than 0.8, and the specificity of skin biopsy specimen is less than 0.9. Only 25% of physicians interviewed chose an intervention consistent with their estimates of prevalence, test characteristics, and outcome evaluations, indicating an opportunity to improve management of this important clinical condition. Conclusions: This decision analysis modeling technique predicts that in patient populations in which the prevalence of GVHD is 30% or greater ( typical for allogeneic stem cell transplantation), the best outcomes were obtained with treatment for GVHD and no skin biopsy. In populations with prevalence of GVHD of 30% or less, obtaining a skin biopsy specimen to guide treatment was predicted to provide the best patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 182
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Cutaneous graft-versus-host disease [J].
Aractingi, S ;
Chosidow, O .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1998, 134 (05) :602-612
[2]   Rush skin biopsy specimens in a tertiary medical center: Diagnostic yield and clinical utility [J].
Barksdale, SK ;
Oberlender, SA ;
Barnhill, RL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1998, 38 (04) :548-554
[3]  
DEEG HJ, 1984, ANNU REV MED, V35, P11, DOI 10.1146/annurev.med.35.1.11
[4]   DRUG-INDUCED SKIN REACTIONS AND ACUTE CUTANEOUS GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST REACTION - A COMPARATIVE IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STUDY [J].
DRIJKONINGEN, M ;
DEWOLFPEETERS, C ;
TRICOT, G ;
DEGREEF, H ;
DESMET, V .
BLUT, 1988, 56 (02) :69-73
[5]  
Gold MR, 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H, P82
[6]  
Hunink MG, 2001, DECISION MAKING HLTH
[7]   SUBACUTE RADIATION DERMATITIS - A HISTOLOGIC IMITATOR OF ACUTE CUTANEOUS GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE [J].
LEBOIT, PE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1989, 20 (02) :236-241
[8]  
Nghiem P, 2001, ARCH DERMATOL, V137, P75
[9]  
PRZEPIORKA D, 1995, BONE MARROW TRANSPL, V15, P825
[10]   USERS GUIDES TO THE MEDICAL LITERATURE .7. HOW TO USE A CLINICAL DECISION-ANALYSIS .A. ARE THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY VALID [J].
RICHARDSON, WS ;
DETSKY, AS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (16) :1292-1295