The Role of Radiofrequency Ablation for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Meta-Analysis

被引:60
作者
Aydin, Steve M. [1 ]
Gharibo, Christopher G. [1 ]
Mehnert, Michael [1 ]
Stitik, Todd P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Anesthesia, Mahwah, NJ 07430 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.03.035
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has become an option for those with chronic or refractory sacroiliac (SI) joint pain. The purpose of this critical review is to assess the existing literature and conduct a meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of RFA of the SI joint for pain relief at 3 and 6 months' after an RFA procedure. An electronic search of PubMed, OVID, Medline, and CINAHL were conducted with keywords; sacroiliac joint, sacroiliac pain, sacroiliac syndrome, sacroiliac radiofrequency ablation, sacroiliac neurolysis, sacroiliac injection, and low back pain. Articles that addressed RFA of the SI joint were reviewed. Ten articles ranging from inception to January 1, 2010, were found. The main outcome measure was a reduction of pain by >= 50% post-RFA procedure. At 3 months, 7 groups met the criteria and at 6 months, 6 groups met the criteria. A meta-analysis with a forest plot was done at the 3- and 6-month patient follow-up intervals. The associated standard error was calculated for each study group. An overall weighted average with respective standard error was also obtained. A calculation of 95% confidence intervals (95% Cl) was then derived. A test for heterogeneity, publication bias, and file drawer effect was also done at the 3- and 6-month intervals. At 3 months, a range of 0.538-0.693 was found to have a 95% Cl, with a pooled mean of 0.616. At 6 months, a 95% CI of 0.423-0.576 was found, with a pooled mean of 0.499. The meta-analysis demonstrated that RFA is an effective treatment for SI joint pain at 3 months and 6 months. This study is limited by the available literature and lack of randomized controlled trials. Further standardization of RFA lesion techniques needs to be established, coupled with prospective randomized controlled trials. PM R 2010;2:842-851
引用
收藏
页码:842 / 851
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Pulsed radiofrequency neurotomy: Advances in pain medicine [J].
Ahadian F.M. .
Current Pain and Headache Reports, 2004, 8 (1) :34-40
[2]  
Boswell Mark V, 2005, Pain Physician, V8, P1
[3]  
Braun J, 2000, CLIN RHEUMATOL, V19, P51
[4]  
Buijs Evert J., 2004, Pain Clinic, V16, P139, DOI 10.1163/156856904774134334
[5]   Mechanisms of phrenic nerve injury during radiofrequency ablation at the pulmonary vein orifice [J].
Bunch, TJ ;
Bruce, GK ;
Mahapatra, S ;
Johnson, SB ;
Miller, DV ;
Sarabanda, AV ;
Milton, MA ;
Packer, DL .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (12) :1318-1325
[6]   An alternate method of radiofrequency neurotomy of the sacroiliac joint: A pilot study of the effect on pain, function, and satisfaction [J].
Burnham, Robert S. ;
Yasui, Yutaka .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2007, 32 (01) :12-19
[7]  
Cavillo O, 2000, CURR REV PAIN, V4, P356
[8]   Sacroiliac joint pain: A comprehensive review of anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment [J].
Cohen, SP .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 101 (05) :1440-1453
[9]   Lateral branch blocks as a treatment for sacroiliac joint pain: A pilot study [J].
Cohen, SP ;
Abdi, S .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2003, 28 (02) :113-119
[10]   Randomized placebo-controlled study evaluating lateral branch radiofrequency denervation for sacroiliac joint pain [J].
Cohen, Steven P. ;
Hurley, Robert W. ;
Buckenmaier, Chester C., III ;
Kurihara, Connie ;
Morlando, Benny ;
Dragovich, Anthony .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2008, 109 (02) :279-288