Evaluating Candidate Principal Surrogate Endpoints

被引:136
作者
Gilbert, Peter B. [1 ,3 ]
Hudgens, Michael G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
关键词
Case cohort; Causal inference; Clinical trial; HIV vaccine; Postrandomization selection bias; Structural model; Prentice criteria; Principal stratification;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01014.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Frangakis and Rubin (2002, Biometrics 58, 21-29) proposed a new definition of a surrogate end-point (a "principal" surrogate) based on causal effects. We introduce an estimand for evaluating a principal surrogate, the causal effect predictiveness (CEP) surface, which quantifies how well causal treatment effects on the biomarker predict causal treatment effects on the clinical endpoint. Although the CEP surface is not identifiable due to missing potential outcomes, it can be identified by incorporating a baseline covariate(s) that predicts the biomarker. Given case-cohort sampling of such a baseline predictor and the biomarker in a large blinded randomized clinical trial, we develop an estimated likelihood method for estimating the CEP surface. This estimation assesses the "surrogate value" of the biomarker for reliably predicting clinical treatment effects for the same or similar setting as the trial. A CEP surface plot provides a way to compare the surrogate value of multiple biomarkers. The approach is illustrated by the problem of assessing an immune response to a vaccine as a surrogate endpoint for infection.
引用
收藏
页码:1146 / 1154
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Breslow NE, 1980, STAT METHODS CANC RE, V1, DOI DOI 10.1097/00002030-199912240-00009
[2]   Criteria for the validation of surrogate endpoints in randomized experiments [J].
Buyse, M ;
Molenberghs, G .
BIOMETRICS, 1998, 54 (03) :1014-1029
[3]   Use of statistical models for evaluating antibody response as a correlate of protection against varicella [J].
Chan, ISF ;
Li, S ;
Matthews, H ;
Chan, C ;
Vessey, R ;
Sadoff, J ;
Heyse, J .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (22) :3411-3430
[4]   Augmented designs to assess immune response in vaccine trials [J].
Follmann, Dean .
BIOMETRICS, 2006, 62 (04) :1161-1169
[5]   Principal stratification in causal inference [J].
Frangakis, CE ;
Rubin, DB .
BIOMETRICS, 2002, 58 (01) :21-29
[6]   STATISTICAL VALIDATION OF INTERMEDIATE END-POINTS FOR CHRONIC DISEASES [J].
FREEDMAN, LS ;
GRAUBARD, BI ;
SCHATZKIN, A .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1992, 11 (02) :167-178
[7]  
GILBERT P, 2003, J INFECT DIS, V191, P666
[8]   CAUSAL INFERENCE IN INFECTIOUS-DISEASES [J].
HALLORAN, ME ;
STRUCHINER, CJ .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 6 (02) :142-151
[9]   Evaluating the predictiveness of a continuous marker [J].
Huang, Ying ;
Pepe, Margaret Sullivan ;
Feng, Ziding .
BIOMETRICS, 2007, 63 (04) :1181-1188
[10]   A NONPARAMETRIC METHOD FOR DEALING WITH MISMEASURED COVARIATE DATA [J].
PEPE, MS ;
FLEMING, TR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 86 (413) :108-113