Linking distributive and procedural justice to employee engagement through social exchange: a field study in India

被引:70
作者
Biswas, Soumendu [1 ]
Varma, Arup [2 ]
Ramaswami, Aarti [3 ]
机构
[1] Management Dev Inst, Dept Human Resource Management, Gurgaon, India
[2] Loyola Univ, Quinlan Sch Business, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] ESSEC Business Sch, Dept Management, Cergy Pontoise, France
关键词
distributive justice; employee engagement; India; POS; procedural justice; psychological contract; social exchange; PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT; MEDIATING ROLE; FIT INDEXES; COMMITMENT; FAIRNESS; PERCEPTIONS; PERSONALITY; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION; MODERATORS;
D O I
10.1080/09585192.2012.725072
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Research linking justice perceptions to employee outcomes has referred to social exchange as its central theoretical premise. We tested a conceptual model linking distributive and procedural justice to employee engagement through social exchange mediators, namely perceived organizational support (POS) and psychological contract, among 238 managers and executives from manufacturing and service sector firms in India. Findings suggest that POS mediated the relationship between distributive justice and employee engagement, and both POS and psychological contract mediated the relationship between procedural justice and employee engagement. Theoretical and practical implications with respect to organizational functions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1570 / 1587
页数:18
相关论文
共 74 条
[11]  
Bies RJ, 2005, HANDBOOK OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE, P85
[12]  
Biswas Soumendu, 2007, Employee Relations, V29, P664, DOI 10.1108/01425450710826131
[13]  
Blau P., 1964, Exchange and Power in Social Life
[14]   Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the "strength" of the HRM system [J].
Bowen, DE ;
Ostroff, C .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2004, 29 (02) :203-221
[15]  
Boxall P., 2000, INT J MANAG REV, V2, P183, DOI [10.1111/1468-2370.00037, DOI 10.1111/1468-2370.00037, 10.1111/14682370.00037, DOI 10.1111/14682370.00037]
[16]   Making sense of procedural fairness: How high procedural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favorability [J].
Brockner, J .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2002, 27 (01) :58-76
[17]  
Browne M. W., 1993, TESTING STRUCTURAL E, P136, DOI DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005
[18]   SINGLE SAMPLE CROSS-VALIDATION INDEXES FOR COVARIANCE-STRUCTURES [J].
BROWNE, MW ;
CUDECK, R .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1989, 24 (04) :445-455
[19]  
Budhwar P., 1998, Management International Review, V38, P105
[20]  
Budhwar P., 2001, THUNDERBIRD INT BUS, V43, P549