GNSS integer ambiguity validation based on posterior probability

被引:21
作者
Wu, Zemin [1 ,2 ]
Bian, Shaofeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Satellite Nav Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Naval Univ Engn, Dept Nav, Wuhan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
GNSS; Ambiguity validation; Hypothesis test; Posterior probability; Failure rate; LINEAR-MODELS; RESOLUTION; GPS;
D O I
10.1007/s00190-015-0826-0
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
GNSS integer ambiguity validation is considered to be a challenge task for decades. Several kinds of validation tests are developed and widely used in these years, but theoretical basis is their weakness. Ambiguity validation theoretically is an issue of hypothesis test. In the frame of Bayesian hypothesis testing, posterior probability is the canonical standard that statistical decision should be based on. In this contribution, (i) we derive the posterior probability of the fixed ambiguity based on the Bayesian principle and modify it for practice ambiguity validation. (ii) The optimal property of the posterior probability test is proved based on an extended Neyman-Pearson lemma. Since validation failure rate is the issue users most concerned about, (iii) we derive the failure rate upper bound of the posterior probability test, so the user can use the posterior probability test either in the fixed posterior probability or in the fixed failure rate way. Simulated as well as real observed data are used for experimental validations. The results show that (i) the posterior probability test is the most effective within the R-ratio test, difference test, ellipsoidal integer aperture test and posterior probability test, (ii) the posterior probability test is computational efficient and (iii) the failure rate estimation for posterior probability test is useful.
引用
收藏
页码:961 / 977
页数:17
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Betti B., 1993, Manuscripta Geodaetica, V18, P317
[2]   The Bayesian approach applied to GPS ambiguity resolution.: A mixture model for the discrete-real ambiguities alternative [J].
de Lacy, MC ;
Sansò, F ;
Rodriguez-Caderot, G ;
Gil, AJ .
JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2002, 76 (02) :82-94
[3]  
EULER HJ, 1991, IAG SYMP, V107, P285
[4]  
Frei E., 1990, MANUSCR GEOD, V15, P326
[5]   Confidence regions for GPS baselines by Bayesian statistics [J].
Gundlich, B ;
Koch, KR .
JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2002, 76 (01) :55-62
[6]   Quality-control issues relating to instantaneous ambiguity resolution for real-time GPS kinematic positioning [J].
Han, S .
JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 1997, 71 (06) :351-361
[7]  
Han S, 1996, P IEEE PLANS 96 ATL, P245
[8]  
Hassibi A, 1998, IEEE T SIGNAL PROCES, V46, P2938, DOI 10.1109/78.726808
[9]   Ambiguity validation with combined ratio test and ellipsoidal integer aperture estimator [J].
Ji, Shengyue ;
Chen, Wu ;
Ding, Xiaoli ;
Chen, Yongqi ;
Zhao, Chunmei ;
Hu, Congwei .
JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2010, 84 (10) :597-604
[10]  
KOCH KR, 1990, BAYESIAN INFERENCE G