Belief in Fake News is Associated with Delusionality, Dogmatism, Religious Fundamentalism, and Reduced Analytic Thinking

被引:272
作者
Bronstein, Michael V. [1 ]
Pennycook, Gordon [2 ]
Bear, Adam [3 ]
Rand, David G. [4 ]
Cannon, Tyrone D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Dept Psychol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Univ Regina, Hill Levene Sch Business, Regina, SK, Canada
[3] Harvard Univ, Dept Psychol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] MIT, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, Sloan Sch Management, E25-618, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
Fake news; Dogmatism; Dual-process theory; Religious fundamentalism; Actively open-minded thinking; Delusion-proneness; DUAL-PROCESS THEORIES; COGNITIVE REFLECTION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; IDEATION; SCALE; BIAS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Delusion-prone individuals may be more likely to accept even delusion-irrelevant implausible ideas because of their tendency to engage in less analytic and less actively open-minded thinking Consistent with this suggestion, two online studies with over 900 participants demonstrated that although delusion-prone individuals were no more likely to believe true news headlines, they displayed an increased belief in "fake news" headlines, which often feature implausible content. Mediation analyses suggest that analytic cognitive style may partially explain these individuals' increased willingness to believe fake news. Exploratory analyses showed that dogmatic individuals and religious fundamentalists were also more likely to believe false (but not true) news, and that these relationships may be fully explained by analytic cognitive style. Our findings suggest that existing interventions that increase analytic and actively open-minded thinking might be leveraged to help reduce belief in fake news.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 117
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Dogmatic behavior among students: Testing a new measure of dogmatism
    Altemeyer, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 142 (06) : 713 - 721
  • [2] Altemeyer B., 1992, The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, V2, P113, DOI [10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5, DOI 10.1207/S15327582IJPR0202_5, 10.1207/s15327582ijpr02025, DOI 10.1207/S15327582IJPR02025]
  • [3] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, J EXPT PSYCHOL GEN
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2018, COGNITION
  • [6] The relation between different types of religiosity and analytic cognitive style
    Bahcekapili, Hasan G.
    Yilmaz, Onurcan
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2017, 117 : 267 - 272
  • [7] Baron J., 1985, Rationality and intelligence
  • [8] THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    BARON, RM
    KENNY, DA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) : 1173 - 1182
  • [9] The relationship between schizotypal facets and conspiracist beliefs via cognitive processes
    Barron, David
    Furnham, Adrian
    Weis, Laura
    Morgan, Kevin D.
    Towell, Tony
    Swami, Viren
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2018, 259 : 15 - 20
  • [10] Bias Against Disconfirmatory Evidence in a large Nonclinical Sample: Associations with Schizotypy and Delusional Beliefs
    Bronstein, Michael V.
    Cannon, Tyrone D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2017, 8 (03): : 288 - +