How deep does justice go? Addressing ecological, indigenous, and infrastructural justice through nature-based solutions in New York City

被引:21
作者
Grabowski, Zbigniew Jakub [1 ,2 ]
Wijsman, Katinka [3 ]
Tomateo, Claudia [1 ]
McPhearson, Timon [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] New Sch, Urban Syst Lab, New York, NY 10011 USA
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Chair Strateg Landscape Planning & Management, Emil Ramann Str 6, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
[3] Univ Utrecht, Dept Human Geog & Spatial Planning, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Cary Inst Ecosyst Studies, Millbrook, NY USA
[5] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Environmental justice; Indigenous environmental justice; Nature-based solutions; Social-ecological-technological systems; Urban systems; New York City; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FUTURES; SPACE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2022.09.022
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Scholarship on Nature-based Solutions (NbS) primarily focuses on the potential for NbS to deliver multiple benefits to humans and biodiversity from networked natural systems. These approaches, if enacted without sensitivity to local contexts and histories, can deepen long standing injustices resulting from the destruction of complex self-organizing ecological systems, the usurpation of Indigenous governance and knowledge, and the prioritization of technical managerial approaches transforming nature into infrastructure. Here we review, synthesize, and critically reflect on existing scholarship on the rise of NbS in New York City, USA, to inform environmental policy in support of just transformations of complex urban systems. To do so, we examine NbS within the context of the social-ecological-technological system (SETS) of NYC. We organize our review and synthesis around three interrelated concepts of justice: Ecological, Indigenous Environmental, and Infrastructural Justice. Ecological Justice entails addressing the harms, needs, and desired futures of ecological actors while identifying synergies with human focused environmental justice concerns and movements. Indigenous Envi-ronmental Justice requires restoring Indigenous systems of governance and knowledge while making space for a diversity of social-ecological practices of marginalized communities. Infrastructural Justice addresses the his-torical and ongoing injustices perpetuated through mainstream infrastructure policy and design practice - including Environmental Justice concerns - which have increasingly turned towards NbS. Without embedding these principles within emergent NbS focused environmental policy agendas seeking just transformations, they will likely recreate utilitarian, anthropocentric, and colonial modes of managing nature as infrastructure. We conclude with a research-to-action agenda for meeting the interdependent needs of urban ecosystems and humans.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 181
页数:11
相关论文
共 141 条
[91]  
McNeur C., 2014, TAMING MANHATTAN TAM
[92]  
McPhearson T., 2022, ONE EARTH
[93]  
McPhearson T, 2017, ROU STUD SUST TRANS, P65
[94]   Mapping ecosystem services in New York City: Applying a social-ecological approach in urban vacant land [J].
McPhearson, Timon ;
Kremer, Peleg ;
Hamstead, Zoe A. .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 5 :E11-E26
[95]  
McPhearson Timon, 2013, P279
[96]   The politics of multifunctional green infrastructure planning in New York City [J].
Meerow, Sara .
CITIES, 2020, 100
[97]  
Miller TR, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
[98]  
Montalto FA, 2004, WETLANDS, V24, P414, DOI 10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0414:TLBHAR]2.0.CO
[99]  
2
[100]  
Nash R.F., 1989, The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics