Modality switching in a property verification task: an ERP study of what happens when candles flicker after high heels click

被引:25
作者
Collins, Jennifer [1 ]
Pecher, Diane [2 ]
Zeelenberg, Rene [2 ]
Coulson, Seana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Cognit Sci, Brain & Cognit Lab, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[2] Erasmus Univ, Dept Psychol, Fac Social Sci, Memory Lab, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
property verification; modality switch; ERPs; grounded cognition;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00010
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The perceptual modalities associated with property words, such as flicker or click, have previously been demonstrated to affect subsequent property verification judgments (Pecher et al., 2003). Known as the conceptual modality switch effect, this finding supports the claim that brain systems for perception and action help subserve the representation of concepts. The present study addressed the cognitive and neural substrate of this effect by recording event-related potentials (ERPs) as participants performed a property verification task with visual or auditory properties in key trials. We found that for visual property verifications, modality switching was associated with an increased amplitude N400. For auditory verifications, switching led to a larger late positive complex. Observed ERP effects of modality switching suggest property words access perceptual brain systems. Moreover, the timing and pattern of the effects suggest perceptual systems impact the decision-making stage in the verification of auditory properties, and the semantic stage in the verification of visual properties.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, The Big Book of Concepts (Bradford Books)
[2]   Grounded cognition [J].
Barsalou, Lawrence W. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 59 :617-645
[3]  
Barsalou LW, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P577, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X99532147
[4]   Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems [J].
Barsalou, LW ;
Simmons, WK ;
Barbey, AK ;
Wilson, CD .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2003, 7 (02) :84-91
[5]   EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, SEMANTIC PROCESSES, AND EXPECTANCY FACTORS IN WORD RECOGNITION [J].
BENTIN, S .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1987, 31 (02) :308-327
[6]   P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli [J].
Comerchero, MD ;
Polich, J .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 110 (01) :24-30
[7]   A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing [J].
Federmeier, KD ;
Kutas, M .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1999, 41 (04) :469-495
[8]   Perceptual knowledge retrieval activates sensory brain regions [J].
Goldberg, RF ;
Perfetti, CA ;
Schneider, W .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 26 (18) :4917-4921
[9]   The redundant target effect is affected by modality switch costs [J].
Gondan, M ;
Lange, K ;
Rösler, F ;
Röder, B .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2004, 11 (02) :307-313
[10]   Modality shift effects mimic multisensory interactions: an event-related potential study [J].
Gondan, Matthias ;
Vorberg, Dirk ;
Greenlee, Mark W. .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 182 (02) :199-214