Meta-analysis of ERP investigations of pain empathy underlines methodological issues in ERP research

被引:94
作者
Coll, Michel-Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Radcliffe Observ Quarter, Anna Watts Bldg,Woodstock Rd, Oxford OX2 6HG, England
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
empathy; pain; ERP; methods; meta-analysis; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; NEURAL RESPONSES; OTHERS PAIN; BRAIN POTENTIALS/FIELDS; EMOTION; SELF; PERCEPTION; GUIDELINES; BIAS; EEG;
D O I
10.1093/scan/nsy072
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Empathy has received considerable attention from the field of cognitive and social neuroscience. A significant portion of these studies used the event-related potential (ERP) technique to study the mechanisms of empathy for pain in others in different conditions and clinical populations. These show that specific ERP components measured during the observation of pain in others are modulated by several factors and altered in clinical populations. However, issues present in this literature such as analytical flexibility and lack of type 1 error control raise doubts regarding the validity and reliability of these conclusions. The current study compiled the results and methodological characteristics of 40 studies using ERP to study empathy of pain in others. The results of the meta-analysis suggest that the centro-parietal P3 and late positive potential component are sensitive to the observation of pain in others, while the early N1 and N2 components are not reliably associated with vicarious pain observation. The review of the methodological characteristics shows that the presence of selective reporting, analytical flexibility and lack of type 1 error control compromise the interpretation of these results. The implication of these results for the study of empathy and potential solutions to improve future investigations are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1003 / 1017
页数:15
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [71] Guidelines for reporting an fMRI study
    Poldrack, Russell A.
    Fletcher, Paul C.
    Henson, Richard N.
    Worsley, Keith J.
    Brett, Matthew
    Nichols, Thomas E.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2008, 40 (02) : 409 - 414
  • [72] Making big data open: data sharing in neuroimaging
    Poldrack, Russell A.
    Gorgolewski, Krzysztof J.
    [J]. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 17 (11) : 1510 - 1517
  • [73] THE FILE DRAWER PROBLEM AND TOLERANCE FOR NULL RESULTS
    ROSENTHAL, R
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1979, 86 (03) : 638 - 641
  • [74] Attention and emotion:: an ERP analysis of facilitated emotional stimulus processing
    Schupp, HT
    Junghöfer, M
    Weike, AI
    Hamm, AO
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 2003, 14 (08) : 1107 - 1110
  • [75] Emotional facilitation of sensory processing in the visual cortex
    Schupp, HT
    Junghöfer, M
    Weike, AI
    Hamm, AO
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (01) : 7 - 13
  • [76] Intergroup relationships do not reduce racial bias in empathic neural responses to pain
    Sebastian Contreras-Huerta, Luis
    Hielscher, Emily
    Sherwell, Chase S.
    Rens, Natalie
    Cunnington, Ross
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2014, 64 : 263 - 270
  • [77] Taking one's time in feeling other-race pain: an event-related potential investigation on the time-course of cross-racial empathy
    Sessa, Paola
    Meconi, Federica
    Castelli, Luigi
    Dell'Acqua, Roberto
    [J]. SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 9 (04) : 454 - 463
  • [78] False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant
    Simmons, Joseph P.
    Nelson, Leif D.
    Simonsohn, Uri
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (11) : 1359 - 1366
  • [79] A Screening Mechanism Differentiating True from False Pain during Empathy
    Sun, Ya-Bin
    Lin, Xiao-Xiao
    Ye, Wen
    Wang, Ning
    Wang, Jin-Yan
    Luo, Fei
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [80] Measuring empathy for human and robot hand pain using electroencephalography
    Suzuki, Yutaka
    Galli, Lisa
    Ikeda, Ayaka
    Itakura, Shoji
    Kitazaki, Michiteru
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5