Effects of hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy on major postoperative pulmonary complications

被引:113
作者
Briez, N. [1 ,3 ]
Piessen, G. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Torres, F. [1 ,3 ]
Lebuffe, G. [2 ,3 ]
Triboulet, J. -P. [1 ,3 ]
Mariette, C. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Reg Univ Lille, Univ Hosp Claude Huriez, Dept Digest & Oncol Surg, F-59037 Lille, France
[2] Ctr Hosp Reg Univ Lille, Univ Hosp Claude Huriez, Dept Anaesthesiol, F-59037 Lille, France
[3] Univ Lille Nord France, Med Sect, Lille, France
[4] INSERM, UMR837, Jean Pierre Aubert Res Ctr, F-59045 Lille, France
关键词
TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY; CANCER; CARCINOMA; RESECTION; OUTCOMES; MOBILIZATION; REPLACEMENT; SURGERY; STOMACH; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.8931
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Morbidity after oesophageal cancer surgery remains high, mainly due to major postoperative pulmonary complications (MPPCs). The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy (HMIO) decreases the 30-day MPPC rate without compromising oncological outcomes. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing curative oesophagectomy for cancer by laparoscopic gastric mobilization and open thoracotomy (HMIO) between January 2004 and December 2009 were matched to randomly selected patients undergoing a totally open approach during the same study interval. Matching variables were age, sex, cancer stage, location of the primary tumour, histological subtype, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, malnutrition, neoadjuvant chemoradiation and epidural analgesia. Results: MPPCs at 30 days were significantly less frequent after HMIO compared with open surgery (15.7 versus 42.9 per cent; P < 0.001). Postoperative in-hospital mortality and overall morbidity rates were 4.3 and 47.5 per cent respectively, again significantly lower in the HMIO group: 1.4 versus 7.1 per cent (P = 0.018) and 35.7 versus 59.3 per cent (P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, HMIO, adenocarcinoma subtype, epidural analgesia and surgery after 2006 were independent protective factors against MPPCs, and HMIO was independently protective against acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Lymph node yields and survival were similar in the two groups. Conclusion: HMIO for oesophageal cancer, using laparoscopic gastric mobilization and open right thoracotomy, offered a substantial and independent protective effect against MPPCs, including ARDS, without compromising oncological outcomes. Copyright (c) 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1547 / 1553
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Laparoscopic hand-assisted vs open transhiatal esophagectomy - A case-control study [J].
Bernabe, KQ ;
Bolton, JS ;
Richardson, WS .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (03) :334-337
[2]   A laparoscopy-assisted surgical approach to esophageal carcinoma [J].
Bonavina, L ;
Bona, D ;
Binyom, PR ;
Peracchia, A .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2004, 117 (01) :52-57
[3]   Laparoscopic versus open gastroplasty in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A comparative study [J].
Bresadola, Vittorio ;
Terrosu, Giovanni ;
Cojutti, Alessandro ;
Benzoni, Enrico ;
Baracchini, Elena ;
Bresadola, Fabrizio .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2006, 16 (02) :63-67
[4]   Results of the combination of open transthoracic esophagectomy with laparoscopic gastric tube formation for esophageal cancer [J].
Cense, H. A. ;
Busch, O. R. C. ;
Bemelman, W. A. ;
Obertop, H. ;
van Lanschot, J. J. B. .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 23 (03) :164-168
[5]   Respiratory complications after oesophagectomy for cancer [J].
D'Journo, X. -B. ;
Michelet, P. ;
Avaro, J. -P. ;
Trousse, D. ;
Giudicelli, R. ;
Fuentes, P. ;
Doddoli, C. ;
Thomas, P. .
REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES, 2008, 25 (06) :683-694
[6]   Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer [J].
Decker, Georges ;
Coosemans, Witty ;
De Leyn, Paul ;
Decaluwe, Herbert ;
Nafteux, Philippe ;
Van Raemdonck, Dirk ;
Lerut, Toni .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2009, 35 (01) :13-21
[7]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[8]   Systematic review of minimally invasive resection for gastro-oesophageal cancer [J].
Gemmill, E. H. ;
McCulloch, P. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (12) :1461-1467
[9]   Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic gastric mobilization [J].
Godiris-Petit, Gaelle ;
Munoz-Bongrand, Nicolas ;
Honigman, Isabelle ;
Cattan, Pierre ;
Sarfati, Emile .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 30 (08) :1434-1440
[10]   Perioperative outcomes after transition from conventional to minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in a specialized center [J].
Hamouda, Ahmed H. ;
Forshaw, Matthew J. ;
Tsigritis, Kostas ;
Jones, Greg E. ;
Noorani, Aliya S. ;
Rohatgi, Ash ;
Botha, Abraham J. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (04) :865-869