Effects of Restoration and Substrate on Polymerization Contraction Stress of Dental Composites

被引:6
作者
Feng, L. [1 ]
Nunez, R. [1 ]
Carvalho, R. [1 ]
Suh, B. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Bisco Inc, Dept Res & Dev, Schaumburg, IL USA
关键词
dental/craniofacial material; composite/hard tissue; polymerization; stress; modeling; MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; SHRINKAGE-STRESS; RESIN RESTORATIONS; CURING CONTRACTION; C-FACTOR; CONFIGURATION; LAYERS; THICKNESS; CEMENTS;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.b.31163
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to treat both restoration and substrate as a combined factor (RS-factor) to complement the popular C-factor in prediction of polymerization contraction stress (PCS). A simple model consists of a uniaxial restoration with a curing composite sandwiched between two solid mountings (substrates). By using the equal stress principle and taking into account substrate deformation, a set of equations were developed and solved, resulting in a mathematical relationship between PCS and the size and stiffness of the substrate and the restoration. The strain gage method was used to experimentally assess the PCS of a light-cured composite encircled in an aluminum ring. Differently sized inserts made of cured composites and glass were placed in the center of the ring to control the thickness of the composite to be cured and created different RS factors as well as C-factors. According to the model, a restoration with a small RS-factor will produce a high PCS. The model also predicts that a restoration with a small C-factor will have a high PCS because of the compliance of substrates. These predictions were tentatively confirmed by the strain gage measurements. A higher PCS was detected when a smaller insert was used, which created a smaller RS-factor or C-factor, or when a glass insert was used instead of a less stiff composite insert, in which the former created a smaller RS-factor. The RS-factor may be a dominant factor in determining the PCS outcome in some special cases. (c) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 88B: 482-491, 2009
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 491
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness [J].
Alster, D ;
Feilzer, AJ ;
de Gee, AJ ;
Davidson, CL .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1997, 13 (03) :146-150
[2]   Influence of compliance of the substrate materials on polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers [J].
Alster, D ;
Venhoven, BAM ;
Feilzer, AJ ;
Davidson, CL .
BIOMATERIALS, 1997, 18 (04) :337-341
[3]   The influence of water storage and C-factor on the dentin-resin composite microtensile bond strength and debond pathway utilizing a filled and unfilled adhesive resin [J].
Armstrong, SR ;
Keller, JC ;
Boyer, DB .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2001, 17 (03) :268-276
[4]   Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin [J].
Bouillaguet, S ;
Troesch, S ;
Wataha, JC ;
Krejci, I ;
Meyer, JM ;
Pashley, DH .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2003, 19 (03) :199-205
[5]  
Bouschlicher MR, 1997, AM J DENT, V10, P88
[6]  
Braga Roberto R, 2004, J Appl Oral Sci, V12, P1, DOI 10.1590/S1678-77572004000500002
[7]  
BRANDRUP J, 1989, POLYM HDB, P79
[8]  
Carvalho RM, 1996, OPER DENT, V21, P17
[9]  
Choi KK, 2004, OPER DENT, V29, P462
[10]   The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite [J].
Choi, KK ;
Condon, JR ;
Ferracane, JL .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 (03) :812-817