Moving average quality control: principles, practical application and future perspectives

被引:55
作者
van Rossum, Huub H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Lab Med, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Huvaros, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
analytical quality control; average of normal; moving average; quality assurance; quality control; LONG-TERM STABILITY; LABORATORY DATA; PATIENT DATA; NORMALS; TIME; IMPLEMENTATION; OPTIMIZATION; TOOLS; SUM;
D O I
10.1515/cclm-2018-0795
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Moving average quality control (MA QC) was described decades ago as an analytical quality control instrument. Although a potentially valuable tool, it is struggling to meet expectations due to its complexity and need for evidence-based guidance. For this review, relevant literature and the world wide web were examined in order to (i) explain the basic concepts and current understanding of MA QC, (ii) discuss moving average (MA) optimization methods, (iii) gain insight into practical aspects related to applying MA in daily practice and (iv) describe future prospects to enable more widespread acceptance and application of MA QC. Each of the MA QC optimization methods currently available has their own advantages and disadvantages. Recently developed simulation methods provide realistic error detecting properties for MA QC and are available for laboratories. Operational MA management issues have been identified that allow developers of MA software to upgrade their packages to support optimal MA QC application and guide laboratories on MA management issues, such as MA alarm workup. The new insights into MA QC characteristics and operational issues, together with supporting online tools, may promote more widespread acceptance and application of MA QC.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 782
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AL AN MAN SYST
[2]   Can a combination of average of normals and "real time" External Quality Assurance replace Internal Quality Control? [J].
Badrick, Tony ;
Graham, Peter .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2018, 56 (04) :549-553
[3]   Continuous Improvement in Continuous Quality Control [J].
Bennett, Sterling T. .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2016, 62 (10) :1299-1301
[4]  
BULL BS, 1974, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V61, P473
[5]   Patient Population Controls [J].
Carey, R. Neill .
CLINICS IN LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2013, 33 (01) :139-+
[6]   ASSESSMENT OF AVERAGE OF NORMALS QUALITY-CONTROL PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTATION [J].
CEMBROWSKI, GS ;
CHANDLER, EP ;
WESTGARD, JO .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1984, 81 (04) :492-499
[7]   The Empower project - a new way of assessing and monitoring test comparability and stability [J].
De Grande, Linde A. C. ;
Goossens, Kenneth ;
Van Uytfanghe, Katleen ;
Stockl, Dietmar ;
Thienpont, Linda M. .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2015, 53 (08) :1197-1204
[8]   Changing the paradigm of laboratory quality control through implementation of real-time test results monitoring: For patients by patients [J].
Fleming, James K. ;
Katayev, Alexander .
CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2015, 48 (7-8) :508-513
[9]   Monitoring laboratory data across manufacturers and laboratories-A prerequisite to make "Big Data" work [J].
Goossens, Kenneth ;
Van Uytfanghe, Katleen ;
Twomey, Patrick J. ;
Thienpont, Linda M. .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2015, 445 :12-18
[10]   Patient pools and the use of "patient means" are valuable tools in quality control illustrated by a bone-specific alkaline phosphatase assay [J].
Hinge, Maja ;
Lund, Erik D. ;
Brandslund, Ivan ;
Plesner, Torben ;
Madsen, Jonna S. .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 54 (03) :403-406