Greenhouse gas emissions and energy use associated with production of individual self-selected US diets

被引:139
作者
Heller, Martin C. [1 ]
Willits-Smith, Amelia [2 ]
Meyer, Robert [1 ]
Keoleian, Gregory A. [1 ]
Rose, Donald [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Ctr Sustainable Syst, 440 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Tulane Univ, Dept Global Community Hlth & Behav Sci, 1440 Canal St,Suite 2210, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2018年 / 13卷 / 04期
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
dataFIELD; cumulative energy demand; NHANES; diet shifts; NUTRITIONAL QUALITY; CARBON FOOTPRINT; FOOD; RECOMMENDATIONS; AGRICULTURE; CONSUMPTION; IMPACTS; CHOICES;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/aab0ac
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Human food systems are a key contributor to climate change and other environmental concerns. While the environmental impacts of diets have been evaluated at the aggregate level, few studies, and none for the US, have focused on individual self-selected diets. Such work is essential for estimating a distribution of impacts, which, in turn, is key to recommending policies for driving consumer demand towards lower environmental impacts. To estimate the impact of US dietary choices on greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) and energy demand, we built a food impacts database from an exhaustive review of food life cycle assessment (LCA) studies and linked it to over 6000 as-consumed foods and dishes from 1 day dietary recall data on adults (N= 16 800) in the nationally representative 2005-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Food production impacts of US self-selected diets averaged 4.7 kgCO(2) eq. person(-1) day(-1) (95% CI: 4.6-4.8) and 25.2 MJ non-renewable energy demand person(-1) day(-1) (95% CI: 24.6-25.8). As has been observed previously, meats and dairy contribute the most to GHGE and energy demand of US diets; however, beverages also emerge in this study as a notable contributor. Although linking impacts to diets required the use of many substitutions for foods with no available LCA studies, such proxy substitutions accounted for only 3% of diet-level GHGE. Variability across LCA studies introduced a +/- 19% range on the mean diet GHGE, but much of this variability is expected to be due to differences in food production locations and practices that can not currently be traced to individual dietary choices. When ranked by GHGE, diets from the top quintile accounted for 7.9 times the GHGE as those from the bottom quintile of diets. Our analyses highlight the importance of utilizing individual dietary behaviors rather than just population means when considering diet shift scenarios.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] The Impacts of Dietary Change on Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Land Use, Water Use, and Health: A Systematic Review
    Aleksandrowicz, Lukasz
    Green, Rosemary
    Joy, Edward J. M.
    Smith, Pete
    Haines, Andy
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (11):
  • [2] Life cycle environmental impacts of carbonated soft drinks
    Amienyo, David
    Gujba, Haruna
    Stichnothe, Heinz
    Azapagic, Adisa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (01) : 77 - 92
  • [3] [Anonymous], LIF CYCL ASS DRINK W
  • [4] [Anonymous], LOSS ADJ FOOD AV DOC
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2017, INVENTORY US GREENHO
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2015, USDA NAT NUTR DAT ST
  • [7] [Anonymous], AGR 2 0
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2016, Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator
  • [9] Bajzelj B, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P924, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2353, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2353]
  • [10] Is a diet low in greenhouse gas emissions a nutritious diet? - Analyses of self-selected diets in the LifeGene study
    Balter, Katarina
    Sjors, Camilla
    Sjolander, Arvid
    Gardner, Christopher
    Hedenus, Fredrik
    Tillander, Annika
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 75