How orthodox protestant parents decide on the vaccination of their children: a qualitative study

被引:69
作者
Ruijs, Wilhelmina L. M. [1 ]
Hautvast, Jeannine L. A. [1 ]
van Ijzendoorn, Giovanna [2 ]
van Ansem, Wilke J. C. [1 ]
van der Velden, Koos [1 ]
Hulscher, Marlies E. J. L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Acad Collaborat Ctr AMPHI, Dept Primary & Community Care, NL-6525 EZ Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Municipal Hlth Serv GGD Rivierenland, NL-4001 WG Tiel, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Sci Inst Qual Healthcare, NL-6525 EZ Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Decision-making; Immunization; Minority group; Religion; Religious objections to vaccination; Vaccination; NETHERLANDS; COVERAGE; DECISIONS; COMMUNITY; IMMUNIZATION; EPIDEMIC; OUTBREAK; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2458-12-408
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Despite high vaccination coverage, there have recently been epidemics of vaccine preventable diseases in the Netherlands, largely confined to an orthodox protestant minority with religious objections to vaccination. The orthodox protestant minority consists of various denominations with either low, intermediate or high vaccination coverage. All orthodox protestant denominations leave the final decision to vaccinate or not up to their individual members. Methods: To gain insight into how orthodox protestant parents decide on vaccination, what arguments they use, and the consequences of their decisions, we conducted an in-depth interview study of both vaccinating and non-vaccinating orthodox protestant parents selected via purposeful sampling. The interviews were thematically coded by two analysts using the software program Atlas.ti. The initial coding results were reviewed, discussed, and refined by the analysts until consensus was reached. Emerging concepts were assessed for consistency using the constant comparative method from grounded theory. Results: After 27 interviews, data saturation was reached. Based on characteristics of the decision-making process (tradition vs. deliberation) and outcome (vaccinate or not), 4 subgroups of parents could be distinguished: traditionally non-vaccinating parents, deliberately non-vaccinating parents, deliberately vaccinating parents, and traditionally vaccinating parents. Except for the traditionally vaccinating parents, all used predominantly religious arguments to justify their vaccination decisions. Also with the exception of the traditionally vaccinating parents, all reported facing fears that they had made the wrong decision. This fear was most tangible among the deliberately vaccinating parents who thought they might be punished immediately by God for vaccinating their children and interpreted any side effects as a sign to stop vaccinating. Conclusions: Policy makers and health care professionals should stimulate orthodox protestant parents to make a deliberate vaccination choice but also realize that a deliberate choice does not necessarily mean a choice to vaccinate.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   The association of health insurance and continuous primary care in the medical home on vaccination coverage for 19-to 35-month-old children [J].
Allred, Norma J. ;
Wooten, Karen G. ;
Kong, Yuan .
PEDIATRICS, 2007, 119 :S4-S11
[2]  
[Anonymous], BEWAAR PAND SPANNING
[3]  
Baars-Blom JM, 2006, ONSCHULD VOORBIJ REF
[4]   Qualitative analysis of mothers' decision-making about vaccines for infants: The importance of trust [J].
Benin, AL ;
Wisler-Scher, DJ ;
Colson, E ;
Shapiro, ED ;
Holmboe, ES .
PEDIATRICS, 2006, 117 (05) :1532-1541
[5]  
Bijkerk H, 1972, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V116, P549
[6]  
Bijkerk H, 1979, Dev Biol Stand, V43, P195
[7]  
Blom O, 2006, GEMOEDSBEZWAARDEN
[8]   Anti-vaccination movements and their interpretations [J].
Blume, S .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 62 (03) :628-642
[9]  
Capadose A, 1823, BESTRIJDING VACCINE
[10]   GROUNDED THEORY RESEARCH - PROCEDURES, CANONS AND EVALUATIVE CRITERIA [J].
CORBIN, J ;
STRAUSS, A .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE, 1990, 19 (06) :418-427