Interventions Using High-Technology Communication Devices: A State of the Art Review

被引:32
作者
Baxter, Susan [1 ]
Enderby, Pam
Evans, Philippa
Judge, Simon [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sect Publ Hlth, Sheffield S1 4DA, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Barnsley Dist Gen Hosp Fdn Trust, Barnsley, England
关键词
Augmentative and alternative communication; Systematic review; Assistive technology; BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE; SEVERE MOTOR IMPAIRMENT; SPEECH-GENERATING DEVICES; CHRONIC SEVERE APHASIA; ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION; FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION; PROCESSING PROSTHESIS; MULTIPLE DISABILITIES; DEVELOPMENTAL-DISABILITIES; ENVIRONMENTAL STIMULI;
D O I
10.1159/000338250
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background/Aims: In the last 20 years the range of high-technology augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) aids has rapidly expanded. This review aimed to provide a 'state of the art' synthesis, to provide evidence-based information for researchers, potential users and service providers. Methods: Electronic databases were searched from 2000 to 2010, together with reference lists of included papers and review papers. The review considered work of any design which reported an intervention using high-tech AAC with people who have communication difficulties (excluding those with solely hearing or visual loss) published in peer-reviewed journals. Results: Sixty-five papers reporting interventions using high-tech AAC were identified. There was evidence that high-technology AAC may be beneficial across a range of diagnoses and ages. The evidence, however, is currently drawn from studies using designs considered to be at high risk of bias. Conclusion: The review suggests that the high level of individual variation in outcome requires a greater understanding of characteristics of clients who may or may not benefit from this technology. Also, the wide range of outcomes measured requires further work in the field to establish what a 'good outcome' from intervention may be. Copyright (C) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 144
页数:8
相关论文
共 79 条
[11]   Improved comprehension of object names following voice output communication aid use: Two case studies [J].
Brady, Nancy C., 2000, Decker Periodicals Publishing, Inc., Hamilton, Canada (16)
[12]   Writing with voice: an investigation of the use of a voice recognition system as a writing aid for a man with aphasia [J].
Bruce, C ;
Edmundson, A ;
Coleman, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2003, 38 (02) :131-148
[13]   Use of aided language stimulation to improve syntactic performance during a weeklong intervention program [J].
Bruno, Joan ;
Trembath, David .
AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION, 2006, 22 (04) :300-313
[14]  
Campbell L., 2002, Advances in Speech Language Pathology, V4, P89, DOI DOI 10.1080/14417040210001669311
[15]  
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2007, SYST REV CRDS GUID U
[16]   Three-minute critical appraisal of a case series article [J].
Chan, Kevin ;
Bhandari, Mohit .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 45 (02) :103-104
[17]   Using a single-switch voice output communication aid to increase social access for children with severe disabilities in inclusive classrooms [J].
Cosbey, Joanna Evans ;
Johnston, Susan .
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE DISABILITIES, 2006, 31 (02) :144-156
[18]  
Dahl DA, 2008, TECHNOLOGY DISABILIT, V20, P283
[19]  
Dicarlo C.F., 2000, J EARLY INTERVENTION, V23, P191
[20]  
Dyches T.T., 2002, AUGMENT ALTERN COMM, V18, P124, DOI DOI 10.1080/07434610212331281211