Decision Problems in Blockchain Governance: Old Wine in New Bottles or Walking in Someone Else's Shoes?

被引:95
作者
Ziolkowski, Rafael [1 ]
Miscione, Gianluca [3 ]
Schwabe, Gerhard [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Informat Management Res Grp, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Dept Informat, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Business, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
Blockchain governance; decision-making in blockchain systems; blockchain; distributed governance; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; MARKET NOR HIERARCHY; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; BIG DATA; ARCHITECTURE; QUALITY; INFRASTRUCTURES; PERFORMANCE; NETWORK; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/07421222.2020.1759974
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Blockchain comes with the promise of being a disruptive technology with the potential for novel ways of interaction in a wide range of applications. Following broader application, scholarly interest in the technology is growing, though an extensive analysis of blockchain applications from a governance perspective is lacking to date. This research pays special attention to the governance of blockchain systems and illustrates decision problems in 14 blockchain systems from four application domains. Based on academic literature, semi-structured interviews with representatives from those organizations, and content analysis of grey literature, common problems in blockchain governance have been singled out and contextualized. Studying their enactment revealed their relevance to major organizational theories in what we labelled "Patrolling the borders," "External Legitimation," "Reduction of Discretionality," and "Temporal Management." The identification of these problems enriches the scarce body of knowledge on the governance of blockchain systems, resulting in a better understanding of how blockchain governance links to existing concepts and how it is enacted in practice.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 348
页数:33
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]  
Ahlemann F., 2012, Strategic Enterprise Architecture Management: Challenges, Best Practices, P265
[2]   Secure Multiparty Computations on Bitcoin [J].
Andrychowicz, Marcin ;
Dziembowski, Stefan ;
Malinowski, Daniel ;
Mazurek, Lukasz .
2014 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY (SP 2014), 2014, :443-458
[3]   Current Challenges in Practical Object-Oriented Software Design [J].
Aniche, Mauricio ;
Yoder, Joseph ;
Kon, Fabio .
2019 IEEE/ACM 41ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING: NEW IDEAS AND EMERGING RESULTS (ICSE-NIER 2019), 2019, :113-116
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1984, Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTT7SRGF
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, 30 9 INT C INF SYST
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy
[7]   Redactable Blockchain - or - Rewriting History in Bitcoin and Friends [J].
Ateniese, Giuseppe ;
Magri, Bernardo ;
Venturi, Daniele ;
Andrade, Ewerton R. .
2017 IEEE EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY (EUROS&P), 2017, :111-126
[8]   MedRec: Using Blockchain for Medical Data Access and Permission Management [J].
Azaria, Asaph ;
Ekblaw, Ariel ;
Vieira, Thiago ;
Lippman, Andrew .
PROCEEDINGS 2016 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OPEN AND BIG DATA - OBD 2016, 2016, :25-30
[9]   Distributed Ledgers and Operations: What Operations Management Researchers Should Know About Blockchain Technology [J].
Babich, Volodymyr ;
Hilary, Gilles .
M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2020, 22 (02) :223-240
[10]  
Bartoletti Massimo, 2017, Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2017 International Workshops WAHC, BITCOIN, VOTING, WTSC, and TA. Revised Selected Papers: LNCS 10323, P568, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-70278-0_36